【24h】

BANKING IN THE SHADOWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CHINA AND INDIA

机译:影子银行:中国和印度的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent years there has been increasing interest in the rise of shadow banking in China and India. In this paper, we aim to get a better understanding of the differences in trends and investigate the factors leading to the increase of shadow banking in these two major emerging economies. We find that financial exclusion is a common factor leading to the growth of shadow banking in both countries. While financial reform has taken place in India, financially repressive policies still prevail in China. Although several regulatory measures have been adopted in India and China, the size of the shadow banking sector in these two countries remains underestimated. Thus, streamlining and enhancing data collection is a key priority for both nations. We argue that regulation in both countries should be more activity focused (specific field in which a shadow bank is focused on) rather than sector or entity based, and it should be at par with banks. The shadow banks provide last mile connectivity to remote, distant, and ignored segments of the population not serviced by the formal financial sector. As this enhances financial inclusion, a balanced approach is required keeping in view both costs and benefits of the shadow banking system.
机译:近年来,人们对中国和印度影子银行的兴起越来越感兴趣。在本文中,我们旨在更好地理解趋势差异,并研究导致这两个主要新兴经济体影子银行增加的因素。我们发现金融排斥是导致两国影子银行增长的共同因素。尽管印度进行了金融改革,但中国仍然实行金融抑制政策。尽管印度和中国已经采取了几种监管措施,但这两个国家的影子银行部门规模仍然被低估了。因此,精简和加强数据收集是两国的首要任务。我们认为,两国的监管都应更加关注活动(影子银行所关注的特定领域),而不是以部门或实体为基础,并且应该与银行保持一致。影子银行提供了到最后一英里的连接,这些连接到正规金融部门无法提供服务的偏远,遥远和被忽略的人群。由于这会增强金融包容性,因此需要一种平衡的方法,同时考虑影子银行系统的成本和收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号