首页> 外文期刊>Australian academic and research libraries >Socially practical or practically unsociable? A study into social media policy experiences in Queensland cultural heritage institutions
【24h】

Socially practical or practically unsociable? A study into social media policy experiences in Queensland cultural heritage institutions

机译:在社会上实际还是在社交上不友善?昆士兰文化遗产机构的社交媒体政策经验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With an online presence now paramount, many libraries, archives and museums have created, or are looking to create, a social media policy; one that will dictate an accepted level of interaction and outline how practitioners within these cultural heritage institutions use social media. But is the use of social media policy in direct defiance of the purpose of social media? And more importantly, is it practical for cultural heritage institutions to have one? This paper aims to answer these questions by reporting on the results of a study into the social media policy experiences of practitioners at the State Library of Queensland, Queensland State Archives and Queensland Museum. Findings from this study indicate that it is practical for cultural heritage institutions to have a social media policy if it inspires confidence, empowers practitioners, and encourages them to use social media.
机译:由于现在的在线状态至关重要,许多图书馆,档案馆和博物馆已经创建或正在寻求创建社交媒体政策。一项将规定可接受的互动水平,并概述这些文化遗产机构中的从业人员如何使用社交媒体。但是,使用社交媒体政策是否直接违背了社交媒体的目的?更重要的是,文化遗产机构拥有一个是否切实可行?本文旨在通过对昆士兰州州立图书馆,昆士兰州州立档案馆和昆士兰州博物馆从业人员的社交媒体政策经验的研究结果进行报告,回答这些问题。这项研究的结果表明,如果文化遗产机构能够激发信心,增强从业者的能力并鼓励他们使用社交媒体,那么制定社交媒体政策是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号