...
首页> 外文期刊>Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine >Cost‑effectiveness of proton therapy in treating base of skull chordoma
【24h】

Cost‑effectiveness of proton therapy in treating base of skull chordoma

机译:质子疗法治疗颅底脊索瘤的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

While proton beam therapy (PBT) can offer increased sparing of healthy tissue, it is associated with large capital costs and as such, has limited availability. Furthermore, it has not been well established whether PBT has significant clinical advantages over conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for all tumour types. PBT can potentially offer improved clinical outcomes for base of skull chordoma (BOSCh) patients compared with photon (X-ray) therapy, however the cost-effectiveness of these treatments is unclear. In this study, the cost-effectiveness of PBT in the treatment of BOSCh patients is assessed, based on an analysis of comparative radiotherapy treatment plans using a radiobiological Markov model. Seven BOSCh patients had treatment plans for the delivery of intensity modulated proton therapy and VMAT retrospectively analysed. The patient outcome (in terms of tumour local control and normal tissue complications) after receiving each treatment was estimated with a radiobiological Markov model. In addition, the model estimated the cost of both the primary treatment and treating any resultant adverse events. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was obtained for each patient. PBT was found to be cost-effective for 5 patients and cost-saving for 2. The mean ICER was AUD$1,990 per quality adjusted life year gained. Variation of model parameters resulted in the proton treatments remaining cost-effective for these patients. Based on this cohort, PBT is a cost-effective treatment for patients with BOSCh. This supports the inclusion of PBT for BOSCh in the Medicare Services Advisory Committee 1455 application.
机译:质子束疗法(PBT)可以增加健康组织的备用量,但它伴随着巨大的投资成本,因此可用性有限。此外,对于所有类型的肿瘤,PBT是否比常规的容积调制弧光治疗(VMAT)具有显着的临床优势,尚无定论。与光子(X射线)治疗相比,PBT可能为颅骨脊索瘤(BOSCh)患者的基础提供更好的临床结果,但是这些治疗的成本效益尚不清楚。在这项研究中,基于对使用放射生物学马尔可夫模型的放射治疗比较计划的分析,评估了PBT在BOSCh患者治疗中的成本效益。七名BOSCh患者有治疗计划,以进行强度调制质子治疗和VMAT的回顾性分析。使用放射生物学马尔可夫模型估计接受每种治疗后的患者预后(就肿瘤局部控制和正常组织并发症而言)。此外,该模型还估算了主要治疗和治疗任何由此产生的不良事件的成本。获得了每位患者的增量成本效益比(ICER)。发现PBT对5例患者具有成本效益,对2例而言节省了成本。平均ICER为每增加一个质量调整生命年1,990 AUD。模型参数的变化导致质子治疗对这些患者仍然具有成本效益。基于这一队列,PBT对BOSCh患者是一种经济有效的治疗方法。这支持将BOSCh的PBT纳入Medicare Services咨询委员会1455申请中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号