首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >A comparative analysis of malodor samples between direct (olfactometry) and indirect (instrumental) methods
【24h】

A comparative analysis of malodor samples between direct (olfactometry) and indirect (instrumental) methods

机译:直接法(嗅觉法)和间接法(仪器法)之间恶臭样品的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relationship between direct (olfactometry) and indirect (instrumental) methods for odor detection was assessed using a total of 70 odor samples collected from several industrial sectors. To this end, a number of instrumental techniques have been employed to measure the concentrations of major odorant groups, including reduced sulfur compounds (RSC), volatile organic compounds (VOC), aldehydes, and nitrogenous compounds. The odorant data obtained by the indirect methods were then converted into the following three modified odor indices: (1) the (algebraic) sum of odor concentration (SOC), (2) the sum of odor quotient (SOQ) by considering the relation between odorant concentration and threshold value, and (3) the sum of odor intensity (SOI) based on suprathreshold olfactometry. These derivatized indices were then compared against the results of the direct method, i.e., dilution to the threshold (D/T) ratio via olfactometry such as air dilution sensory (ADS) test. When the relationship was investigated between D/T ratios and those three derivatized indices, the results of 70 samples were strongly correlated with the Pearson coefficients (r) of 0.671 for SOC (P = 1.92E-10), 0.866 for SOQ (P = 2.74E-22), and 0.852 for SOI (P = 6.53E-21). It thus confirms that the odorant concentration data measured by instrumental method can be used effectively to account for the odor intensity estimated by the sensory method for samples collected under strong source activities.
机译:使用从多个工业部门收集的总共70种气味样品评估了直接(嗅觉测定法)和间接(仪器测量)气味检测方法之间的关系。为此,已经采用了许多仪器技术来测量主要气味基团的浓度,包括还原的硫化合物(RSC),挥发性有机化合物(VOC),醛和含氮化合物。然后将通过间接方法获得的气味数据转换为以下三个经过修改的气味指数:(1)气味浓度(SOC)的(代数)总和,(2)通过考虑以下因素之间的关系得出的气味商总和(SOQ):气味浓度和阈值,以及(3)基于超阈嗅觉法的气味强度总和(SOI)。然后将这些衍生指数与直接方法的结果进行比较,即通过诸如空气稀释感官(ADS)测试之类的嗅觉法将稀释至阈值(D / T)的比率进行比较。当研究D / T比率与这三个衍生指标之间的关系时,SOC的Pearson系数(r)为0.671(P = 1.92E-10),SOQ的Pearson系数(r)为0.666,SOQ的0.866(P = 2.74E-22),SOI为0.852(P = 6.53E-21)。因此,证实了通过仪器方法测量的气味剂浓度数据可以有效地用于解释在强源活动下收集的样品通过感官方法估算的气味强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号