首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Comparison between light scattering and gravimetric samplers for PM10 mass concentration in poultry and pig houses
【24h】

Comparison between light scattering and gravimetric samplers for PM10 mass concentration in poultry and pig houses

机译:家禽和猪舍中PM10质量浓度的光散射和重量采样器的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare co-located real-time light scattering devices and equivalent gravimetric samplers in poultry and pig houses for PM10 mass concentration, and to develop animal-specific calibration factors for light scattering samplers. These results will contribute to evaluate the comparability of different sampling instruments for PM10, concentrations. Paired DustTrak light scattering device (DustTrak aerosol monitor, TSI, U.S.) and PM10 gravimetric cyclone sampler were used for measuring PM10 mass concentrations during 24 h periods (from noon to noon) inside animal houses. Sampling was conducted in 32 animal houses in the Netherlands, including broilers, broiler breeders, layers in floor and in aviary system, turkeys, piglets, growing-finishing pigs in traditional and low emission housing with dry and liquid feed, and sows in individual and group housing. A total of 119 pairs of 24 h measurements (55 for poultry and 64 for pigs) were recorded and analyzed using linear regression analysis. Deviations between samplers were calculated and discussed. In poultry, cyclone sampler and DustTrak data fitted well to a linear regression, with a regression coefficient equal to 0.41, an intercept of 0.16 mg m(-3) and a correlation coefficient of 0.91 (excluding turkeys). Results in turkeys showed a regression coefficient equal to 1.1 (P = 0.49), an intercept of 0.06 mg m(-3) (P < 0.0001) and a correlation coefficient of 0.98. In pigs, we found a regression coefficient equal to 0.61, an intercept of 0.05 mg m(-3) and a correlation coefficient of 0.84. Measured PM10 concentrations using DustTraks were clearly underestimated (approx. by a factor 2) in both poultry and pig housing systems compared with cyclone pre-separators. Absolute, relative, and random deviations increased with concentration. DustTrak light scattering devices should be self-calibrated to investigate PM10 mass concentrations accurately in animal houses. We recommend linear regression equations as animal-specific calibration factors for DustTraks instead of manufacturer calibration factors, especially in heavily dusty environments such as animal houses. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较家禽和猪舍中共置的实时光散射设备和等效重量采样器的PM10质量浓度,并为光散射采样器开发特定于动物的校准因子。这些结果将有助于评估不同采样仪器对PM10浓度的可比性。使用成对的DustTrak光散射装置(DustTrak气溶胶监测器,美国TSI)和PM10重量旋风分离器在动物室内24小时内(从中午到中午)测量PM10的质量浓度。在荷兰的32家动物房中进行了采样,包括肉鸡,肉鸡饲养员,鸡舍和禽舍中的蛋鸡,火鸡,仔猪,采用传统和低排放房舍的干猪和液体饲料的成年猪,以及个体和母猪。团体住房。总共记录了119对24小时测量值(家禽为55对,猪为64对),并使用线性回归分析进行了分析。计算并讨论了采样器之间的偏差。在家禽中,气旋采样器和DustTrak数据非常适合线性回归,回归系数等于0.41,截距为0.16 mg m(-3),相关系数为0.91(不包括火鸡)。火鸡的结果显示回归系数等于1.1(P = 0.49),截距为0.06 mg m(-3)(P <0.0001),相关系数为0.98。在猪中,我们发现回归系数等于0.61,截距为0.05 mg m(-3),相关系数为0.84。与旋风预分离器相比,在家禽和猪舍系统中使用DustTraks测得的PM10浓度明显低估了(大约2倍)。绝对偏差,相对偏差和随机偏差随浓度而增加。应该对DustTrak光散射设备进行自我校准,以准确调查动物舍中PM10的质量浓度。我们建议将线性回归方程式作为DustTraks的动物特定校准因子,而不是制造商校准因子,尤其是在尘土飞扬的环境中,例如动物舍。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号