...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Satellite-based PM2.5 estimation using fine-mode aerosol optical thickness over China
【24h】

Satellite-based PM2.5 estimation using fine-mode aerosol optical thickness over China

机译:基于中国细模式气溶胶光学厚度的卫星PM2.5估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate estimation of ground-level PM2.5 from satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness (AOT) presents various difficulties. This is because the association between AOT and surface PM2.5 can be affected by many factors, such as the contribution of fine mode AOT (FM-AOT) and the weather conditions. In this study, we compared the total AOT and FM-AOT for surface PM2.5 estimation using ground-based measurements collected in Xingtai, China from May to June 2016. The correlation between PM2.5 and FM-AOT was higher (r = 0.74) than that between PM2.5 and total AOT (r = 0.49). Based on FM-AOT, we developed a ground-level PM2.5 retrieval method that incorporated a Simplified Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm (SARA) AOT, look-up table-spectral deconvolution algorithm (LUT-SDA) fine mode fraction (FMF), and the PM2.5 remote sensing method. Due to the strong diurnal variations displayed by the particle density of PM2.5, we proposed a pseudo-density for PM2.5 retrieval based on real-time visibility data. We applied the proposed method to determine retrieval surface PM2.5 concentrations over Beijing from December 2013 to June 2015 on cloud-free days. Compared with Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) data, the LUT-SDA FMF was more easily available than the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) FMF. The derived PM2.5 results were compared with the ground-based monitoring values (30 stations), yielding an R-2 of 0.64 and root mean square error (RMSE) = 18.9 mu g/m(3) (N = 921). This validation demonstrated that the developed method performed well and produced reliable results. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:根据卫星衍生的气溶胶光学厚度(AOT)准确估算地面PM2.5会遇到各种困难。这是因为AOT和地面PM2.5之间的关联会受到许多因素的影响,例如精细模式AOT(FM-AOT)的贡献和天气条件。在这项研究中,我们使用2016年5月至2016年6月在中国邢台采集的地面测量值比较了总的AOT和FM-AOT进行的地面PM2.5估计。PM2.5与FM-AOT之间的相关性更高(r =比PM2.5和总AOT之间的平均值高0.74)(r = 0.49)。我们基于FM-AOT,开发了一种地面PM2.5检索方法,该方法结合了简化的气溶胶检索算法(SARA)AOT,查找表光谱反卷积算法(LUT-SDA)精细模式分数(FMF)和PM2.5遥感方法。由于PM2.5的颗粒密度显示出强烈的昼夜变化,因此我们提出了基于实时可见性数据的伪密度用于PM2.5检索。我们应用拟议的方法来确定2013年12月至2015年6月北京在无云天的地面PM2.5浓度。与气溶胶机器人网络(AERONET)数据相比,LUT-SDA FMF比中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)FMF更容易获得。将得出的PM2.5结果与地面监测值(30个站点)进行比较,得出R-2为0.64,均方根误差(RMSE)= 18.9μg / m(3)(N = 921)。该验证表明,开发的方法性能良好,并产生了可靠的结果。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric environment》 |2017年第12期|290-302|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Global Change & Earth Syst Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China|Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Land Surveying & Geoinformat, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China;

    Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Land Surveying & Geoinformat, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Global Change & Earth Syst Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China|Univ Maryland, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA;

    Univ Maryland, Earth Syst Sci Interdisciplinary Ctr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA|Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, State Environm Protect Key Lab Satellite Remote S, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China;

    San Diego State Univ, Dept Geog, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA;

    Capital Normal Univ, Coll Resource Environm & Tourism, Beijing, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, State Environm Protect Key Lab Satellite Remote S, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China;

    Capital Normal Univ, Coll Resource Environm & Tourism, Beijing, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    PM2.5; MODIS; Fine mode fraction; AOT;

    机译:PM2.5;MODIS;精细模式分数;AOT;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号