首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Field investigations for evaluating green infrastructure effects on air quality in open-road conditions
【24h】

Field investigations for evaluating green infrastructure effects on air quality in open-road conditions

机译:评估开放道路条件下绿色基础设施对空气质量的影响的实地调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many people live, work and spend time during their commute in near-road environments ( 50 m) where pollutant concentrations usually remain high. We investigated the influence of roadside green infrastructure (GI) on concentrations of particulate matters = 10 mu m (PM10), = 2.5 mu m (PM2.5), = 1 mu m (PM1), black carbon (BC) and particle number concentrations (PNC) under three GI configurations - (i) hedges only, (ii) trees only, and (iii) a mix of trees and hedges/shrubs-separately in close ( 1 m) and away ( 2 m) road conditions. These configurations gave us a total of six different real-world scenarios for evaluation. The changes in concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, PM1, BC and PNC at all six sites were estimated by comparing simultaneous measurements behind and in front of GI (or adjacent clear area). A portable battery-operated experimental set-up was designed for measuring the pollutant concentrations for 30 full days over a field campaign period of three months. On each day, around 10 h of continuous data were recorded simultaneously behind and in front of GI/adjacent clear area, capturing both morning and evening traffic peaks. Our objectives were to: (i) assess the effectiveness of different types of GI in reducing various pollutants; (ii) evaluate the impact of wind directions and density of vegetation on reducing different pollutant concentrations behind GI; (iii) investigate the changes in fractional composition of sub-micron (PM1), fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM2.5-10) particles; and (iv) quantify the elemental composition of collected particles before and after the GI. In away-road conditions, all three configurations showed reductions behind the GI for all pollutants. The 'hedges only' configuration showed higher pollutant reductions than the other two configurations, with maximum reductions of up to 63% shown for BC. In close-road conditions, the results were mixed. The 'trees only' configuration reported increases in most of the pollutant concentrations, whereas the combination of trees and hedges resulted in reduced pollutant concentrations behind the GI. Among all pollutants, the highest relative changes in concentration were observed for BC (up to 63%) and lowest for PM2.5 (14%). Categorising the data based on wind directions showed the highest reduction during along-road wind conditions (i.e., parallel to the road). This was expected due to the sweeping of emissions by the wind and the wake of road vehicles whilst the barrier effect of GI enhanced this cleansing, limiting lateral diffusion of the pollutants. However, cross-road winds that took vehicular emissions to pass through the GI allowed us to assess their influence, showing up to 52, 15, 17, 31 and 30% reduction for BC, PM10, PM2.5, PM1 and PNC, respectively. The largest reductions were consistently noted for the mixed 'trees and hedges' configuration in close-road conditions and the 'hedge only' configuration in away-road conditions. The assessment of various fractions of PM showed that 'hedges only' and a combination of trees and hedges lowered fine particles behind GI. The SEM-EDS analysis indicated the dominance of natural particles (50%) and a reduction in vehicle-related particles (i.e., iron and its oxides, Ba, Cr, Mn) behind GI when compared with the in-front/adjacent clear area.The evidence contributed by this work enhances our understanding of air quality modifications under the influence of different GI configurations, for multiple pollutants. In turn, this will support the formulation of appropriate guidelines for GI design, to reduce the air pollution exposure of those living, working or travelling near busy roads.
机译:在通勤期间,许多人在污染物浓度通常较高的近路环境(<50 m)中生活,工作和度过时间。我们调查了路边绿色基础设施(GI)对颗粒物浓度<= 10微米(PM10),<= 2.5微米(PM2.5),<= 1微米(PM1)和黑碳(BC)的影响和三种胃肠道配置下的颗粒数浓度(PNC)-(i)仅树篱,(ii)仅树木,以及(iii)树木和树篱/灌木的混合-在近距离(<1 m)和远距离(> 2 m)道路条件。这些配置为我们提供了总共六种不同的实际方案进行评估。通过比较在GI(或相邻的净空区域)前后的同时测量值,估算了所有六个位置的PM10,PM2.5,PM1,BC和PNC浓度的变化。设计了一个便携式电池供电的实验装置,用于在三个月的野战期间测量整整30天的污染物浓度。每天,在GI /相邻净空区域的前后都同时记录了大约10个小时的连续数据,记录了早晚的交通高峰。我们的目标是:(i)评估不同类型的地理标志在减少各种污染物方面的有效性; (ii)评估风向和植被密度对减少地理标志后面不同污染物浓度的影响; (iii)研究亚微米(PM1),细颗粒(PM2.5)和粗颗粒(PM2.5-10)颗粒的分数组成的变化; (iv)量化GI之前和之后收集的颗粒的元素组成。在越野情况下,所有三种配置均显示出所有污染物都比GI降低。 “仅对冲”配置显示出比其他两种配置更高的污染物减少量,其中卑诗省的最大减少量高达63%。在近路条件下,结果好坏参半。据报道,“仅树木”配置会增加大多数污染物的浓度,而树木和绿篱的结合会降低地理标志后面的污染物浓度。在所有污染物中,BC的相对浓度变化最高(高达63%),PM2.5的最低相对变化(14%)。根据风向对数据进行分类显示,在沿路风条件下(即与道路平行),减少量最大。预期这是由于风的吹扫和公路车辆的尾流引起的,而GI的屏障作用增强了这种清洁效果,限制了污染物的横向扩散。但是,使车辆排放物通过GI的横风使我们能够评估其影响,从而使BC,PM10,PM2.5,PM1和PNC分别减少了52%,15%,17%,31%和30%。 。在近距离情况下,混合的“树和树篱”配置和在远距离情况下的“仅树篱”配置始终被认为是最大的减少量。对不同比例的PM的评估表明,“仅树篱”以及树木和树篱的组合降低了GI后的细颗粒。 SEM-EDS分析表明,与前部/相邻净空区域相比,GI后的天然颗粒占主导地位(50%),车辆相关颗粒(即铁及其氧化物,Ba,Cr,Mn等)减少这项工作提供的证据加深了我们对不同GI结构对多种污染物影响下空气质量变化的理解。反过来,这将支持制定地理标志设计的适当准则,以减少在繁忙道路附近生活,工作或旅行的人受到的空气污染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号