首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Exposure to air particulate matter with a case study in Guangzhou: Is indoor environment a safe haven in China?
【24h】

Exposure to air particulate matter with a case study in Guangzhou: Is indoor environment a safe haven in China?

机译:以广州为例,研究空气中的颗粒物暴露:室内环境在中国是否是安全的避风港?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Urban residents spend the majority of time in indoor environments, which, however, may not be a safe haven for staying away from outdoor air pollution, especially in China. To examine this hypothesis, the particle mass concentrations (0.056–18 μm) and number concentrations (14–660 nm) were simultaneously measured in and outside of three typical urban indoor settings (n = 9), i.e., school, office and residence in Guangzhou, China from October–November 2014 (dry weather season) and June–August 2015 (wet weather season). The indoor and outdoor particle number concentrations were positively correlated with each other at all three sampling settings for both dry and wet weather seasons (r2 = 0.13–0.65,p < 0.001). The infiltration factors and indoor/outdoor ratios of particles (14–660 nm) were estimated at 0.30–0.75 and 0.85–1.5, respectively, which were comparable to or higher than those (0.12–0.76 and 0.03–1.1) found in cites of other countries under infiltration conditions. Furthermore, the average infiltration factor of fine particle numbers (50–660 nm) in an office was 0.61 during a severe haze episode, indicating that approximately 60% of outdoor particles penetrated indoors. All findings suggested an efficient transport of outdoor particle sources into indoor environment, confirming that exposure of the general public to indoor particles in China should not be overlooked due to effective infiltration of outdoor particles and frequent heavy haze episodes.
机译:城市居民大部分时间都在室内环境中度过,但是,这可能不是远离室外空气污染的避风港,尤其是在中国。为了检验这一假设,在三个典型的城市室内环境(n = 9),即学校,办公室和居住地中,同时测量了粒子质量浓度(0.056–18μm)和数浓度(14–660 nm)。 2014年10月至11月(干旱季节)和2015年6月至8月(潮湿天气)的中国广州。在干燥和潮湿的天气季节,在所有三个采样设置下,室内和室外颗粒物数量浓度彼此呈正相关(r2 = 0.13-0.65,p <0.001)。颗粒物(14-660 nm)的渗透因子和室内/室外比分别估计为0.30-0.75和0.85-1.5,与在美国,加拿大和美国的城市中发现的渗透因子(0.12-0.76和0.03-1.1)相当或更高。其他国家处于渗透条件下。此外,在严重的霾天气中,办公室中细颗粒数(50-660 nm)的平均渗透因子为0.61,这表明大约60%的室外颗粒渗透到室内。所有发现都表明,室外颗粒物源可以有效地输送到室内环境中,这证实了由于室外颗粒物的有效渗透和频繁的浓雾事件,中国公众对室内颗粒物的暴露不容忽视。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric environment》 |2018年第10期|351-359|共9页
  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;

    School of Environment and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University;

    School of Environment and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University;

    Air Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada;

    Air Quality Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada;

    School of Environment and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Urban area; Particle number and mass concentrations; Particle size distribution; Infiltration;

    机译:市区;颗粒数和质量浓度;颗粒大小分布;入渗;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:58:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号