首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >ERRATUM: 'MASSIVE PERTURBER-DRIVEN INTERACTIONS BETWEEN STARS AND A MASSIVE BLACK HOLE' (ApJ, 656, 709 [2007])
【24h】

ERRATUM: 'MASSIVE PERTURBER-DRIVEN INTERACTIONS BETWEEN STARS AND A MASSIVE BLACK HOLE' (ApJ, 656, 709 [2007])

机译:勘误表:“恒星与大质量黑洞之间的大扰动驱动相互作用”(ApJ,656,709 [2007])

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

There is an error in the plotted cumulative mass function of the giant molecular clouds in Figure 2 (top panel, two rightmost curves). Due to a misinterpretation of the mass estimates in Table 1 of T. Oka et al. (ApJ, 562, 348 [2001 ]), Figure 2 includes 12 (out of 60) data points that are multiple entries for the same clouds, expressing alternative mass estimation assumptions (we thank R. O'Leary for pointing this out and T. Oka for clarifying the issue). The corrected observed ratio of second moments of the mass function μ_2 in Table 2 should be modified downward to 10~8 for model GMC1 and to 10~6 for model GMC2. However, the analytic power-law fit for the mass function that was actually used in the numerical calculations was very conservative to begin with, and still conservatively underestimates μ_2 by a factor of 2. Therefore, the results presented in the paper remain unchanged.
机译:图2中的巨型分子云的累积质量函数的绘制误差(顶部面板,两条最右边的曲线)。由于对T. Oka等人的表1中的质量估算值有误解。 (ApJ,562,348 [2001]),图2包括12个(总共60个)数据点,它们是同一云的多个条目,表示替代的质量估计假设(我们感谢R. O'Leary指出了这一点,并提出了T冈为澄清问题)表2中质量函数μ_2的第二矩的校正观测值比率应向下修改为GMC1模型的10〜8和GMC2模型的10〜6。但是,数值计算中实际使用的质量函数的解析幂律拟合一开始就非常保守,但仍然保守地低估了μ_22倍。因此,本文中给出的结果保持不变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号