首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >THE UNIVERSE AND GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: AN AGE CONFLICT?
【24h】

THE UNIVERSE AND GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: AN AGE CONFLICT?

机译:宇宙团聚体:年龄冲突?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chaboyer (1995) has recently shown that the range of possible ages of globular clusters, τ ~14-18 Gyr, corresponding to different choices of distance scales, is further enlarged mainly by uncertainties in modeling convection. Within the mixing-length theory (MLT) the result is τ = 11—21 Gyr. Bolte & Hogan (1995) adopted the field subdwarfs as indicators of the distance scale and, assuming that τ is insensitive to the treatment of convection, found that τ = (15.8 ± 2.1) Gyr. Within Chaboyer's findings, it is marginally possible to avoid an "age conflict" with the expansion age of the universe, even if this latter is t_0 = 8-11 Gyr, while this is not the case with the Bolte & Hogan (1995) conclusion. Mazzitelli, D'Antona, & Caloi (1995) have implemented updated macro- and microphysics inputs and determined the distance scale by fitting the horizontal-branch models to the horizontal branch of metal-poor globular clusters. Within the MLT, they find τ approx= 14 Gyr. Switching from MLT to a full spectrum of turbulence (FST) model of convection (Canuto & Mazzitelli 1991) lowers the value of τ by 1-2 Gyr. Since the Mazzitelli et al. (1995) results would alleviate the age conflict to the point of making it disappear, it is important to assess their validity by answering the following questions. Independently of the assumptions on the distance scale: 1. What is the role of convection near turnoff on both its shape and luminosity? Chaboyer (1995) and Mazzitelli et al. (1995) find an appreciable effect, while Bolte & Hogan (1995) a priori assume no such effect. 2. How meaningful is the fit of the red giant branch in the determination of τ? In this paper, we answer question carrying out extensive new stellar model calculations. When we assume the long distance scale, the FST results differ from the MLT values both in the shape and in the luminosity of the turnoff, while there is no appreciable difference if one employs the short distance scale. Helium sedimentation also affects the shape of isochrones and age determination. The long distance scale is also shown to be consistent with the subdwarf location. As for, we find that, depending on the correlations between T_(eff) and colors, both FST and MLT results can be made compatible with both distance scales. Models including sedimentation of helium improve the agreement with the red giant-branch location for low ages. At present, red giant branches can even be misleading as age indicators. In conclusion, we choose the long distance scale on the basis of both horizontal-branch luminosities and the present data on subdwarf location, with resulting ages of about 12 Gyr for the most metal-poor globular clusters.
机译:Chaboyer(1995)最近发现,球状星团的可能年龄范围τ〜14-18 Gyr,对应于距离尺度的不同选择,主要是由于对流建模的不确定性而进一步扩大的。在混合长度理论(MLT)中,结果为τ= 11-21 Gyr。 Bolte&Hogan(1995)将野外矮矮作为距离尺度的指标,并假设τ对对流处理不敏感,发现τ=(15.8±2.1)Gyr。在Chaboyer的发现中,即使宇宙的膨胀年龄为t_0 = 8-11 Gyr,也有可能避免与宇宙膨胀年龄发生“年龄冲突”,而Bolte&Hogan(1995)的结论却并非如此。 。 Mazzitelli,D'Antona和Caloi(1995)实施了更新的宏观和微观物理学输入,并通过将水平分支模型拟合到贫金属球状星团的水平分支来确定距离尺度。在MLT中,他们发现τ大约= 14 Gyr。从MLT转换为对流全光谱(FST)模型(Canuto&Mazzitelli 1991)会使τ值降低1-2 Gyr。由于Mazzitelli等。 (1995)的结果将缓解年龄冲突,使其消失,重要的是通过回答以下问题来评估其有效性。独立于距离尺度的假设:1.对流在形状和发光度附近对转的作用是什么? Chaboyer(1995)和Mazzitelli等。 (1995年)发现了可观的效果,而Bolte&Hogan(1995年)则没有先验的假设。 2.红色巨人分支的拟合在确定τ时有多重要?在本文中,我们回答了进行大量新的恒星模型计算的问题。当我们假设长距离刻度时,FST结果与MLT值的形状和截止亮度都不同,而如果使用短距离刻度则没有明显的差异。氦气沉降也会影响等时线的形状和年龄的确定。长距离刻度也显示与亚矮位一致。至于,我们发现,根据T_(eff)和颜色之间的相关性,可以使FST和MLT结果与两个距离标尺兼容。包括氦气沉积在内的模型可改善与红色巨型分支地点在低年龄段的一致性。目前,红色巨型树枝甚至可能会误导年龄指标。总之,我们根据水平分支的亮度和近矮位的当前数据选择长距离尺度,对于最贫金属的球状星团,其年龄约为12 Gyr。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号