...
首页> 外文期刊>Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education >To risk or not to risk it: student (non‐)engagement with seen examination questions
【24h】

To risk or not to risk it: student (non‐)engagement with seen examination questions

机译:冒险还是不冒险:学生(不参加)看过的考试题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This case study explores students’ perceptions of seen examination questions about topics not covered by the formal curriculum of a final‐year economics module and of the associated group support sessions. Eight semi‐structured interviews with a total of 13 students were analysed. Contrary to expectations, learners taking a strategic approach to the module were not attracted by the seen questions. The uncertainty of an unfamiliar assessment format and the prospect of undertaking independent research and group work were perceived as involving more risks than the familiar unseen examination. Take‐up for the seen examination questions was low, and the students who did not answer a seen question tended to make workload considerations as well as concerns about group work for assessment purposes responsible for their decision. Despite not participating in the group support sessions, a few students researched the seen question in conjunction with trusted fellow students or on their own. The students who answered a seen question enjoyed the autonomy which the seen exam questions provided, while other students were critical of the way in which their autonomy might be externally controlled. The study provides insight into the impact of assessment on risk taking and students’ perception of risk associated with this type of assessment.View full textDownload full textKeywordsassessment, risk, seen exam questions, autonomy, group workRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903311716
机译:本案例研究探讨了学生对所学考试题的看法,这些题与最后一年经济学模块的正式课程以及相关的小组支持课程未涵盖的主题有关。分析了八次半结构化访谈,共13名学生。与期望相反,学习者对模块采取策略性的方法并没有被所看到的问题所吸引。与不熟悉的看不见的考试相比,人们认为不熟悉的评估形式的不确定性以及从事独立研究和小组工作的前景涉及更多的风险。对可见考试的答题率很低,并且没有回答可见问题的学生往往会考虑工作量以及出于评估目的而对小组工作的担忧。尽管没有参加小组支持会议,但仍有一些学生与可信赖的同学一起或独自研究了所见问题。回答了所见问题的学生享有所见考试题所提供的自主权,而其他学生则对他们的自主性可能受到外部控制的方式持批评态度。该研究提供了对评估对冒险的影响的洞察力,以及与这种评估相关的学生对风险的感知。查看全文下载全文关键词评估,风险,看过的考试题,自主权,小组工作相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor &Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903311716

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号