首页> 外文期刊>Aslib Proceedings >Benchmarking e-government policy within the e-Europe programme
【24h】

Benchmarking e-government policy within the e-Europe programme

机译:在电子欧洲计划中对电子政务政策进行基准测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The paper aims to provide a benchmark study of the European Union (EU) e-government policy within the e-Europe programme. The main objective of the European strategy for the development of e-government was that the member states should ensure "online public services". To monitor this policy the European Commission defined two indicators. Design/methodology/approach - The European Commission developed a list of 20 basic public services. The Commission and Capgemini defined a framework to evaluate the online availability of each of the services in each of the EU member states, plus Norway, Iceland and Switzerland. Findings - The study finds that since 2001 a considerable improvement in online public service provision was measured, even so the 2004 result of 65 per cent online sophistication of public service delivery in the EU still shows an important gap with the 100 per cent objective, the result was considered a positive. When considering the different types of public services, income generating services including income tax, VAT and corporate tax are by far the most developed online. The new member countries seem to be only two years behind in the development of online public service. The most advanced countries exceed 80 per cent but seem to evolve to a "plateau". They have developed their most feasible services, demanding less effort, now only the "hard" ones are undeveloped, mostly services delivered at a decentralised level. Research limitations/implications - The study provides information on the online development of public services, i.e. the provision and interactivity of public services through the internet. It does not analyse the provision of services through other channels, neither the quality of the service delivery, nor the use or impact of these new ways of public service supply. Therefore a new EU e-government measurement system must change the focus from "availability" of e-government services, to "use" and desired positive "impact" of e-government programmes. Originality/value - This study provides the only available data measured scientifically over a longer period concerning the development of e-government in the EU.
机译:目的-本文旨在为电子欧洲计划内的欧盟(EU)电子政务政策提供基准研究。欧洲电子政务发展战略的主要目标是成员国应确保“在线公共服务”。为了监督该政策,欧洲委员会定义了两个指标。设计/方法/方法-欧盟委员会制定了20种基本公共服务的清单。委员会和凯捷(Capgemini)定义了一个框架,以评估每个欧盟成员国以及挪威,冰岛和瑞士在每种服务中的在线可用性。调查结果-研究发现,自2001年以来,在线公共服务的提供有了显着改善,即使如此,2004年欧盟65%的在线公共服务交付复杂度仍然显示出与100%目标之间的重要差距,即结果被认为是积极的。当考虑不同类型的公共服务时,包括所得税,增值税和公司税在内的创收服务是迄今为止最发达的在线服务。新成员国似乎仅比在线公共服务的发展落后了两年。最先进的国家超过80%,但似乎已发展为“高原”。他们已经开发了最可行的服务,所需的精力更少,现在只有“硬”的服务尚未开发,大部分服务是在分散的水平上提供的。研究的局限性/意义-该研究提供有关公共服务在线开发的信息,即通过互联网提供公共服务并进行交互。它不分析通过其他渠道提供的服务,也不分析服务提供的质量,也不分析这些新的公共服务提供方式的使用或影响。因此,新的欧盟电子政务测量系统必须将重点从电子政务服务的“可用性”变为电子政务计划的“使用”和期望的积极“影响”。原创性/价值-这项研究提供了有关欧盟电子政务发展的较长时期内科学测量的唯一可用数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号