...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian security >The ASEAN Regional Forum and Preventive Diplomacy: Built to Fail?
【24h】

The ASEAN Regional Forum and Preventive Diplomacy: Built to Fail?

机译:东盟区域论坛与预防性外交:失败了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Various reasons purport to explain why the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Regional Forum (ARF) has failed to evolve from confidence building to preventive diplomacy (PD). These include the ARF's large membership, its strict adherence to sovereignty and noninterference principles that contradict any effective implementation of PD, and contrasting strategic perspectives among its participants. Although these factors have certainly hindered security cooperation, none are sufficient conditions by themselves to explain the forum's ambivalence toward PD. The authors argue that these factors do not tell the whole story, not least when they have not stood in the way of experiments in PD by other processes in the Asia-Pacific. The claim here is that the ARF has evolved into a highly inflexible forum, which in turn has led to the formalization of its approach to PD. This has severely inhibited the adoption of a PD agenda and actionable measures under the ARF framework.
机译:各种原因旨在解释为什么东南亚国家联盟区域论坛(ARF)未能从建立信任转变为预防性外交(PD)的原因。其中包括ARF的庞大会员国,严格遵守主权和不干涉原则的原则,这些原则与PD的有效实施相抵触,而且其参与者之间的战略观点也有差异。尽管这些因素确实阻碍了安全合作,但它们本身并没有足够的条件来解释论坛对PD的矛盾态度。作者认为,这些因素并不能说明全部问题,尤其是当它们没有阻碍亚太其他地区进行局部放电试验时。这里的说法是,ARF已经发展成为一个高度僵化的论坛,这反过来又导致了其PD方法的正式化。这严重阻碍了在ARF框架下通过PD议程和可采取的措施。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Asian security》 |2011年第1期|p.44-60|共17页
  • 作者

    RALF EMMERS; SEE SENG TAN;

  • 作者单位

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Block S4, Level B4, Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号