...
首页> 外文期刊>Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research >Efficient Multi-Attribute Auctions Considering Supply Disruption
【24h】

Efficient Multi-Attribute Auctions Considering Supply Disruption

机译:考虑供应中断的高效多属性拍卖

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although supply disruption is ubiquitous because of natural or man-made disasters, many firms still use the price-only reverse auction (only the cost is considered) to make purchase decisions. We first study the suppliers' equilibrium bidding strategies and the buyer's expected revenue under the first- and second-price price-only reverse auctions when the suppliers are unreliable and have private information on their costs and disruption probabilities. We show that the two auctions are equivalent and not efficient. Then we propose two easily implementable reverse auctions, namely the first-price and second-price format announced penalty reverse auction (APRA), and show that the "revenue equivalence principle" holds, i.e., the two auctions generate the same ex ante expected profit to the buyer. We further show that the two reverse auctions are efficient and "truth telling" is the suppliers' dominant strategy in the second-price format APRA. We conduct numerical studies to assess the impacts of some parameters on the bidding strategies, the buyer's profit and social profit.
机译:尽管由于自然或人为灾难而造成供应中断的情况普遍存在,但许多公司仍使用仅价格反向拍卖(仅考虑成本)来做出购买决策。我们首先研究当供应商不可靠并拥有有关其成本和中断概率的私人信息时,在仅以第一价格和第二价格进行的逆向拍卖中,供应商的均衡招标策略和买方的预期收益。我们证明这两次拍卖是等效的,而不是有效的。然后,我们提出了两个易于实施的反向拍卖,即第一价格格式和第二价格格式宣布的罚金反向拍卖(APRA),并证明“收入当量原理”成立,即两次拍卖产生相同的事前收益。给买方的预期利润。我们进一步证明,两次反向拍卖是有效的,“说真话”是第二价格形式APRA中供应商的主导策略。我们进行数值研究,以评估某些参数对出价策略,买方的利润和社会利润的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号