首页> 外文期刊>Asia Pacific Fire Magazine >Are we destroying our ability to be professional?
【24h】

Are we destroying our ability to be professional?

机译:我们是否摧毁了我们的专业能力?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

When I was a young firefighter back in the 1970s there was only one means of getting a qualification that would be recognised for promotion within the service. The Institute of Fire Engineers (IFE) had been for years setting examinations in Britain for use across the Commonwealth. The qualifications were at three levels, i.e. Preliminary, Graduate and Member. This centralized British system was not an ideal situation. Why Hong Kong firefighters had to learn how to put out thatched-roof fires was a talking point, but nevertheless those graduating had an internationally recognised qualification and a great grounding in firefighting theory and practice. Many countries used this standard for recruiting people at middle to senior ranks. Unfortunately, some countries only used the IFE for internal promotion and still made fully competent firefighters go back through a recruit programme 'because their fires are different to everyone else's'!
机译:当我在20世纪70年代返回一个年轻的消防员时,只有一种方法可以获得在服务内部晋升的资格。 消防工程研究所(IFE)一直在英国在英联邦使用年度考试。 资格是三级,即初步,毕业生和成员。 这个集中的英国系统不是一个理想的局面。 为什么香港消防队员必须学习如何推出茅草屋顶的火灾是一个谈话点,但是那些毕业的人在消防理论和实践中具有国际公认的资格和巨大的基础。 许多国家利用本标准招募中部至高级级别的人。 不幸的是,一些国家只使用IFE用于内部促销,并且仍然完全称职的消防员通过招聘计划回来,因为他们的火灾与其他人的意见不同!

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号