首页> 外文期刊>Asia Pacific Education Review >Isn’t it a pyrrhic victory?: over-privatization and universal access in tertiary education of Korea
【24h】

Isn’t it a pyrrhic victory?: over-privatization and universal access in tertiary education of Korea

机译:难道不是胜利吗?:韩国高等教育的过度私有化和普及

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article analyzes the Korean passage to tertiary education for all. With a specific focus on traditional form of higher education, it tries to answer the questions of how and why this extra-ordinary phenomenon happens in a short period of time. Applying a historical sociology method, it attempts to explain the mechanism and consequences of the simultaneous transition to universal access to both the secondary and tertiary education. Over-privatization has been the primary mechanism behind the simultaneous transition since the late 1960s. Such a heavy overflow of privatization in achieving universal access places a significant financial burden on families, particularly those of a disadvantaged socioeconomic status. The more financial resources that come from the private sector, the more difficult it becomes to attain equitable access. There is no sign of a narrowing in the gap which exists among regions, socioeconomic status, gender, and family background, all of which have led to the inequality of access to universities and colleges. My final reflections are put on a simple question: “is this a story of victory or a pyrrhic one?”
机译:本文分析了韩国人人接受高等教育的情况。它特别关注传统的高等教育形式,试图回答这种特殊现象在短时间内如何以及为什么发生的问题。它采用历史社会学方法,试图解释同时过渡到普及中等和高等教育的机制和后果。自1960年代后期以来,过度私有化一直是同时过渡的主要机制。私有化在实现普遍获得方面的沉重负担给家庭,特别是社会经济地位较弱的家庭带来了沉重的经济负担。来自私营部门的财政资源越多,获得公平获取的机会就越困难。没有迹象表明地区之间,社会经济地位,性别和家庭背景之间的鸿沟正在缩小,所有这些都导致大学入学机会不平等。我最后的思考是一个简单的问题:“这是胜利的故事还是痛苦的故事?”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号