首页> 外文期刊>ASHRAE Transactions >Effect of Inlet Duct Design on Fan Performance of Indoor Air Handling Units
【24h】

Effect of Inlet Duct Design on Fan Performance of Indoor Air Handling Units

机译:入口管道设计对室内空气处理装置风扇性能的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ASHRAE RP-1743 investigates the impact of inlet duct design on the fan performance of indoor air handling units during equipment testing. The standard inlet duct specified in ASHRAE 37 can be problematic as the duct might increase the length of the testing setup to exceed the height of legacy testing facilities. Hence, several alternative inlet reduced-length duct configurations were tested to identify a configuration that achieves fan performance comparable to the ASHRAE 37 inlet duct. The considered inlet duct configurations were 4-inch (10.2-cm) straight inlet duct and two unconventional inlet duct configurations. The inlet duct configurations were tested on two 3-ton (10.55-kW) units, one had Electronic Commuted Motor (ECM) and the other had Constant Torque Motor (CTM). Testing of the units for each inlet duct configuration was under two nominal air flowrates, which were 350 CFM/ton (46.97 L/s-kW) and 450 CFM/ton (60.39 L/s-kW), and seven External Static Pressure (ESP) points. Also, testing of the units included investigating various effects, such as hysteresis and atmospheric pressure, that might affect the repeatability of tests of indoor air handling units.The results showed that the effects of hysteresis and atmospheric pressure were significant, as the change in power and air flowrate were more than the uncertainty of measurements, on the unit with an ECM fan, while they were not on the unit with a CTM fan. In terms of inlet duct configurations, fan performance was maintained within the suggested tolerance, which was 5% in power and 2.5% in air flowrate, while testing the two unconventional inlet duct configurations compared to the standard inlet duct. The reduction in the stack-height of the inlet duct was ranged from 60%-80% compared to the standard inlet duct. For 4-inch (10.2-cm) straight inlet duct, the test was conducted on the unit with the CTM fan, and the results showed that fan performance was maintained within the suggested tolerance, as well.
机译:Ashrae RP-1743调查了在设备测试期间室内空气处理单元的风扇性能的影响。由于管道可能会增加测试设置的长度超过传统测试设施的高度,因此在ASHRAE 37中指定的标准入口管道可能是有问题的。因此,测试了几种替代入口减小的管道配置,以识别实现与ASHRAE 37入口管道相当的风扇性能的配置。所考虑的入口管配置为4英寸(10.2厘米)的直入口管道和两个非常规入口管道配置。在两种3吨(10.55千瓦)单位上测试入口管道配置,具有电子称为电动机(ECM),另一个具有恒定的扭矩电动机(CTM)。对每个入口管道配置的单位的测试位于两个标称空气流量下,为350 CFM /吨(46.97L / S-kW)和450 CFM /吨(60.39L / S-kW)和七个外部静压( ESP)点。此外,还包括调查各种效果的单位,例如滞后和大气压,这可能影响室内空气处理单元的试验的可重复性。结果表明,滞后和大气压的影响是显着的,因为功率的变化而空气流量超过测量的不确定性,在带有ECM风扇的装置上,而且在带有CTM风扇的单位上。就入口管道配置而言,风扇性能维持在建议的公差范围内,其功率为5%,在空气流量中为2.5%,同时测试与标准入口管道相比的两个非常规入口管道配置。与标准入口管道相比,入口管道的堆叠高度的降低范围为60%-80%。对于4英寸(10.2厘米)的直入口管道,测试在具有CTM风扇的单元上进行测试,结果显示风扇性能也在建议的耐受性范围内。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ASHRAE Transactions》 |2021年第1期|599-606|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering School Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma;

    Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering School Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号