首页> 外文期刊>Artificial intelligence >Complexity results for preference aggregation over (m)CP-nets: Pareto and majority voting
【24h】

Complexity results for preference aggregation over (m)CP-nets: Pareto and majority voting

机译:偏好聚集的复杂性结果超过(m)CP-Net:帕累托和大多数投票

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aggregating preferences over combinatorial domains has many applications in artificial intelligence (Al). Given the inherent exponential nature of preferences over combinatorial domains, compact representation languages are needed to represent them, and (m)CP-nets are among the most studied ones. Sequential and global voting are two different ways of aggregating preferences represented via CP-nets. In sequential voting, agents' preferences are aggregated feature-by-feature. For this reason, sequential voting may exhibit voting paradoxes, i.e., the possibility to select sub-optimal outcomes when preferences have specific feature dependencies. To avoid paradoxes in sequential voting, one has often assumed the (quite) restrictive constraint of O-legality, which imposes a shared common topological order among all the agents' CP-nets. On the contrary, in global voting, CP-nets are considered as a whole during the preference aggregation process. For this reason, global voting is immune from the voting paradoxes of sequential voting, and hence there is no need to impose restrictions over the CP-nets' structure when preferences are aggregated via global voting. Sequential voting over O-legal CP-nets received much attention, and O-legality of CP-nets has often been required in other studies. On the other hand, global voting over non-O-legal CP-nets has not carefully been analyzed, despite it was explicitly stated in the literature that a theoretical comparison between global and sequential voting was highly promising and a precise complexity analysis for global voting has been asked for multiple times. In quite a few works, only very partial results on the complexity of global voting over CP-nets have been given. In this paper, we start to fill this gap by carrying out a thorough computational complexity analysis of global voting tasks, for Pareto and majority voting, over not necessarily O-legal acyclic binary polynomially connected (m)CP-nets. We show that all these problems belong to various levels of the polynomial hierarchy, and some of them are even in P or LOGSPACE. Our results are a notable achievement, given that the previously known upper bound for most of these problems was the complexity class EXPTIME. We provide various exact complexity results showing tight lower bounds and matching upper bounds for problems that (up to now) did not have any explicit non-obvious lower bound. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:对组合域的聚合偏好在人工智能(AL)中具有许多应用。鉴于组合域对偏好的固有指数性质,需要紧凑的表示语言来表示它们,并且(M)CP-Net是最受研究的。顺序和全球投票是通过CP-Net表示代表偏好的两种不同方式。在顺序投票中,代理的偏好是逐个功能的聚合。因此,顺序投票可以表现出投票悖论,即当偏好具有特定特征依赖性时选择次优不可思议的可能性。为了避免顺序投票中的悖论,经常假设O-合法性的(相当)的限制性限制,这在所有代理商的CP-Net中施加了共同的常见拓扑阶。相反,在全球投票中,在偏好聚合过程中,CP-Net被视为整体。因此,全球投票免受顺序投票的投票悖论免疫,因此当通过全球投票汇总汇总时,无需对CP-Net的结构进行限制。在O-Legal CP-Net上的顺序投票得到了很多关注,并且在其他研究中经常需要CP-Net的O-合法性。另一方面,尽管在文献中明确地说明了全球和顺序投票的理论比较,但全球和顺序投票之间的理论比较具有明确的竞争和全球投票的理论比较,但全球投票尚未分析。已多次被要求。在相当多的作品中,已经给出了对全球投票的复杂性的局面产生了非常部分的结果。在本文中,我们开始通过对全球投票任务进行全局投票任务的彻底计算复杂性分析,开始填补这种差距,对于帕累托和大多数投票,而不是必需的O-Legal无环二元多项式连接(M)CP-Net。我们表明所有这些问题都属于多项式层次结构的各种级别,其中一些甚至在P或LogSpace中。我们的结果是一个值得注意的成就,因为大多数这些问题的先前已知的上限是复杂性级别的exptime。我们提供各种精确的复杂性结果,显示出紧张的下限,并匹配上限(最多)的上限(最多)没有任何明确的非明显下限。 (c)2019年作者。由elsevier b.v出版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号