...
首页> 外文期刊>Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis & Manufacturing >Answering engineers' questions using semantic annotations
【24h】

Answering engineers' questions using semantic annotations

机译:使用语义注释回答工程师的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Question-answering (QA) systems have proven to be helpful, especially to those who feel uncomfortable entering keywords, sometimes extended with search symbols such as +, *, and so forth. In developing such systems, the main focus has been on the enhanced retrieval performance of searches, and recent trends in QA systems center on the extraction of exact answers. However, when their usability was evaluated, some users indicated that they found it difficult to accept the answers because of the absence of supporting context and rationale. Current approaches to address this problem include providing answers with linking paragraphs or with summarizing extensions. Both methods are believed to be sufficient to answer questions seeking the names of objects or quantities that have only a single answer. However, neither method addresses the situation when an answer requires the comparison and integration of information appearing in multiple documents or in several places in a single document. This paper argues that coherent answer generation is crucial for such questions, and that the key to this coherence is to analyze texts to a level beyond sentence annotations. To demonstrate this idea, a prototype has been developed based on rhetorical structure theory, and a preliminary evaluation has been carried out. The evaluation indicates that users prefer to see the extended answers that can be generated using such semantic annotations, provided that additional context and rationale information are made available.
机译:问题解答(QA)系统已被证明是有用的,特别是对于那些对输入关键字感到不舒服的人,有时会使用诸如+,*等搜索符号进行扩展。在开发此类系统时,主要重点是增强搜索的检索性能,而质量检查系统的最新趋势集中在准确答案的提取上。但是,在评估其可用性时,一些用户表示,由于缺乏支持的上下文和理论依据,他们很难接受答案。解决该问题的当前方法包括提供带有链接段落或汇总扩展的答案。相信这两种方法都足以回答寻求仅具有单个答案的物体或数量的名称的问题。但是,这两种方法都不能解决以下情况:答案需要比较和整合出现在多个文档中或单个文档中多个位置的信息。本文认为连贯答案的产生对于此类问题至关重要,而连贯性的关键是将文本分析到句子注释之外的水平。为了证明这一想法,根据修辞结构理论开发了原型,并进行了初步评估。评估表明,如果可以使用其他上下文和基本原理信息,则用户更喜欢使用此类语义注释生成的扩展答案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号