...
首页> 外文期刊>Armed Forces Journal International >Joint combat search and rescue
【24h】

Joint combat search and rescue

机译:联合作战搜救

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Combat search and rescue must be planned for military operations where friendly personnel are in danger of being isolated. This often involves a downed aircrew. But it may include any civilian, soldier or diplomat who is separated from friendly control, either in denied territory behind enemy lines or under the control of hostile forces, such as in a kidnapping. Because special-operations forces (SOF) are trained and equipped to penetrate and operate behind enemy lines, many commanders think of SOF as the force of choice to perform combat search-and-res-cue (CSAE) missions to recover friendly personnel. While in the joint and combined environment SOF may be the most sophisticated asset available, and while SOF are very capable of performing this task, they should not be the force of choice. There are other search-and-rescue assets within the U.S. military services that are trained and ready to conduct CSAR and, in most cases, they can accomplish the rescue mission just as capably as SOF. Furthermore, SOF are considered a strategic asset, and U.S. military doctrine does not favor using strategic assets to accomplish a tactical mission, which CSAR usually is.
机译:必须计划在友好人员有被隔离危险的军事行动中进行搜索和救援。这通常涉及击落机组人员。但是它可能包括在友军控制下的敌对领土内或在敌对势力的控制下(例如在绑架中)与友军控制分开的任何平民,士兵或外交官。由于特种作战部队(SOF)训练有素,可以穿透敌军并在其后方行动,因此许多指挥官将SOF视为执行战斗搜救(CSAE)任务以恢复友军的首选部队。尽管在联合和联合环境中,SOF可能是可用的最复杂的资产,并且SOF很有能力执行此任务,但它们不应成为选择的力量。美国军事部门中还有其他搜救资产经过培训,可以进行CSAR,并且在大多数情况下,它们可以像SOF一样完成救援任务。此外,特种作战部队被认为是一种战略资产,而美国军事学说不赞成使用战略资产来完成战术任务,而这通常是CSAR的做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号