首页> 外文期刊>Archives >The Fifteenth Century, Volume Ⅻ: Society in an Age of Plague
【24h】

The Fifteenth Century, Volume Ⅻ: Society in an Age of Plague

机译:15世纪,第Volume卷:瘟疫时代的社会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The papers contained in this volume explore the plague -its nature, effects and contemporary responses to it- in England, northern France and Italy in the later middle ages and Renaissance. Carole Rawcliffe provides a useful introduction to the collection which locates its chapters in their wider historiographical context. In what is likely to be the most cited article here, Jim Bolton surveys recent archaeological and scientific work on the identity of the disease that caused the Black Death. In the past, the differences between the medieval pandemic and modern occurrences of bubonic plague led a number of scientists and historians to doubt whether they were all the same disease. Bolton shows that DNA evidence from medieval and early modern plague victims does seem to have proved that Yersinia Pestis, the pathogen which causes bubonic plague, was responsible for the Black Death, albeit in the form of a different strain from that found in modern plague outbreaks. However, he also emphasizes the contrasts between medieval and modern plague outbreaks, particularly in their mortality rates and rapidity of transmission, and argues that the medieval disease may have been spread by human fleas or lice rather than by the vector of the rat flea. This article should be read widely and challenges a number of preconceptions about the plague, including its supposedly higher urban mortality rates. In another important article on the epidemiology of the plague, Samuel Cohn accepts that the medieval plague was caused by Yersinia Pestis but, as in his previous work, focuses on the differences between medieval and modern plague outbreaks, contrasting their mortality rates, seasonality, frequency, links with famine, development of immunity, ages of their victims, symptoms and the speed with which they spread. However, unlike Bolton, he doubts whether human fleas or lice were effective vectors of the plague and instead proposes contaminated food and water as its mode of transmission.
机译:该卷中包含的论文探讨了中世纪后期和文艺复兴时期英国,法国北部和意大利的鼠疫-鼠疫的性质,影响和当代对它的反应。卡罗尔·罗克利夫(Carole Rawcliffe)为该系列提供了有用的介绍,该系列将其章节定位在更广泛的历史学背景下。吉姆·博尔顿(Jim Bolton)在可能引起最多引用的文章中,对引起黑死病的疾病身份进行了近期的考古和科学工作调查。过去,中世纪流行病与现代鼠疫的区别使许多科学家和历史学家怀疑它们是否都是同一病。博尔顿(Bolton)表明,来自中世纪和早期现代鼠疫受害者的DNA证据似乎确实证明,引起鼠疫的病原体耶尔森氏菌(Yersinia Pestis)导致了黑死病,尽管其形式与现代鼠疫暴发的菌株不同。但是,他还强调了中世纪和现代鼠疫暴发之间的差异,特别是它们的死亡率和传播速度,并指出中世纪的疾病可能是由人类跳蚤或虱子传播的,而不是由鼠蚤传播的。这篇文章应该被广泛阅读,并且对有关鼠疫的许多成见提出了挑战,包括据称更高的城市死亡率。在关于鼠疫流行病学的另一篇重要文章中,塞缪尔·科恩(Samuel Cohn)接受了中世纪鼠疫是由耶尔森尼亚·佩斯蒂斯(Yersinia Pestis)引起的,但正如他先前的研究一样,重点关注了中世纪鼠疫和现代鼠疫暴发之间的差异,对比了它们的死亡率,季节性和发生频率与饥荒,免疫力的发展,受害者的年龄,症状以及他们传播的速度有关。但是,与博尔顿不同的是,他怀疑人类的跳蚤或虱子是否是瘟疫的有效媒介,而是提出了污染的食物和水作为其传播方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Archives》 |2013年第127期|67-68|共2页
  • 作者

    Stephen H. Rigby;

  • 作者单位

    University of Manchester;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号