...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology >Detection of simulated ADHD and reading disorder using symptom validity measures
【24h】

Detection of simulated ADHD and reading disorder using symptom validity measures

机译:使用症状效度指标检测模拟的ADHD和阅读障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Previous studies have typically focused on the ability of cognitive symptom validity tests to identify cognitive symptom exaggeration in the context of head injury or memory loss. Few published studies have examined the detection of simulated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or reading disorder (RD). The present study examined the accuracy of symptom validity measures in the detection of simulated ADHD and RD. Results indicated that several commonly used symptom validity measures show good validity for detecting simulated ADHD and RD. Total Validity Indicator Profile (VIP) scores and hard item accuracy score from the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT) were the most accurate at distinguishing simulation of ADHD and RD from adequate effort. Percentages of control participants and participants in simulation conditions scoring below a specified cut score are provided to give clinicians an estimate of the simulator (true) positive and control (false) positive rates.
机译:先前的研究通常集中在认知症状有效性测试在识别头部受伤或记忆丧失的情况下识别认知症状夸大的能力。很少有发表的研究检查过模拟注意力不足/多动障碍(ADHD)或阅读障碍(RD)的检测。本研究检验了症状有效性量度在模拟ADHD和RD检测中的准确性。结果表明,几种常用的症状效度测量方法对检测模拟的ADHD和RD具有良好的效度。维多利亚症状有效性测试(VSVT)的总有效性指标概况(VIP)评分和硬项目准确性评分是区分ADHD和RD与适当努力的最准确方法。提供对照参与者和模拟条件得分低于指定割伤分数的参与者的百分比,以为临床医生提供模拟器(真)阳性和对照(假)阳性率的估计值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号