首页> 外文期刊>Archive of Applied Mechanics >Ultrasonic Theological model of cohesive and adhesive zones in aluminum joints: validation by mechanical tests
【24h】

Ultrasonic Theological model of cohesive and adhesive zones in aluminum joints: validation by mechanical tests

机译:铝接头内聚力区和胶合区的超声神学模型:通过机械测试进行验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this paper is to establish a criterion able to distinguish cohesive and adhesive defects in structural joints. To do this, two ultrasonic rheological models are compared to a trilayer model: (1) a cohesive rheological model that corresponds to the standard approach, i.e., the entire adhesive layer is replaced by a spring surface distribution with inertia, and (2) an adhesive rheological model, which consists in describing only the contact zones by a spring surface distribution. It then appears that the cutoff frequencies of guided modes give additional information on the quality of joining. Indeed, the cohesive rheological model makes it possible to quantify global (cohesive) defects in the adhesive layer, while the adhesive rheological model targets local (adhesive) defects on the interface level. To validate this result, ultrasonic experiments and mechanical tests are successively carried out on two types of samples devoid of cohesion defects. Model (2) gives a good description of the differences observed on samples having undergone or not undergone a surface pretreatment.
机译:本文的目的是建立一个能够区分结构接头中的内聚缺陷和胶粘缺陷的标准。为此,将两个超声流变模型与三层模型进行了比较:(1)对应于标准方法的内聚流变模型,即整个粘合剂层被具有惯性的弹簧表面分布代替,(2)胶粘剂流变模型,其特征在于仅通过弹簧表面分布来描述接触区域。这样看来,引导模式的截止频率会给出有关连接质量的更多信息。实际上,内聚流变模型可以量化粘合剂层中的整体(内聚)缺陷,而内聚流变模型则以界面层上的局部(内聚)缺陷为目标。为了验证该结果,对两种没有内聚缺陷的样品依次进行了超声波实验和力学测试。模型(2)很好地描述了在经过或未经过表面预处理的样品上观察到的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号