首页> 外文期刊>Archaeologies >Community Collaboration and Other Good Intentions
【24h】

Community Collaboration and Other Good Intentions

机译:社区合作和其他良好意愿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Collaborative and community-based archaeological research encompasses a broad spectrum of approaches; however, there are often discrepancies between how researchers ‘sell’ the collaborative endeavour in theory and how it is actually practised. Over the past several years, I have had the opportunity to participate in several projects, ranging from those that claimed to be ‘truly collaborative,’ to research that maybe should have asked, ‘what community?’ These experiences raised difficult and disturbing questions concerning the nature and practice of collaborative and community-based archaeology. In this paper, I confront these issues as I have experienced them personally. While community-based practices aim to redress a historical and ongoing power imbalance between the researcher and the researched, constant vigilance is required lest the ‘good intentions’ of anthropologists inadvertently mask an exploitation that may be inherent in the structure of research itself. In considering the corporate nature of academia, I query whether the collaborative research model represents a break with the past, or is instead simply the same old practice dressed up in fashionable new language.
机译:协作和基于社区的考古研究涵盖了广泛的方法。但是,研究人员如何“出售”理论上的合作努力与实际实践之间常常存在差异。在过去的几年中,我有机会参与了多个项目,从声称是“真正合作”的项目到可能应该问“什么社区”的研究,这些经历提出了一些棘手且令人不安的问题,涉及合作和社区考古的性质和实践。在本文中,我亲身经历了这些问题。尽管基于社区的实践旨在纠正研究人员与被研究人员之间历史和持续的权力不平衡,但仍需保持高度警惕,以免人类学家的“善意”无意间掩盖了研究本身可能固有的剥削。考虑到学术界的公司性质,我质疑协作研究模型是否代表了对过去的突破,还是只是用时髦的新语言装扮的相同旧做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号