首页> 外文期刊>Arbitration International >Rehearings of jurisdiction issues: a fresh look at the judicial task
【24h】

Rehearings of jurisdiction issues: a fresh look at the judicial task

机译:司法管辖权问题的预演:重新审视司法任务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is settled that any challenge to a tribunal's jurisdiction must be reheard by the court. However, the case law is inconsistent on the question whether, in the rehearing, new evidence should be admitted as of right or only in limited circumstances and with the court's permission. The inconsistency is illustrated by two recent judgments. This note argues that a party seeking to adduce new evidence should have to seek permission from the court and explain why the evidence was not put before the tribunal. This approach should encourage the parties to act in good faith during the arbitration proceeding.
机译:解决了对法庭管辖权的任何质疑都必须由法院审理。但是,判例法在重新审理中是否应将新证据作为权利还是仅在有限的情况下并经法院许可而被接受这一问题上并不一致。最近的两项判断说明了这种不一致。该说明认为,寻求提供新证据的当事方应向法院寻求许可,并解释为什么没有将证据提交法庭。这种做法应鼓励当事各方在仲裁程序中以诚意行事。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Arbitration International》 |2016年第4期|687-697|共11页
  • 作者

    Amokura Kawharu;

  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Law, The University of Auckland, New Zealand;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号