首页> 外文期刊>The Appraisal Journal >LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
【24h】

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

机译:致编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We, the cosigners of this response, read with great interest the article by David Lennhoff, MAI, SRA, entitled "You Can't Get the Value Right If You Get the Rights Wrong" (Winter 2009). The following comments are not an official position of the Maricopa County Assessor's Office, but are a reflection of the thoughts and concerns we have over what is being proposed in the article.rnThe premise of the article appears to be that single-tenant, built-to-suit (or custom) commercial real estate can be overvalued if an appraiser focuses solely on property-specific factors, rather than general market forces, to estimate market value. The article then goes on to assert that "the best support for the components of both the sales comparison approach and the components of the income capitalization approach is second-generation space." To automatically default to valuing first-generation space as if it were second-generation space ignores the market's acceptance of the property.
机译:我们,这个回应的共同签署者,非常感兴趣地阅读了MAI,SRA的David Lennhoff的文章,题为“如果权利错了,就无法正确获得价值”(2009年冬季)。以下评论不是Maricopa县评估办公室的正式立场,而是对我们对本文提出的建议的想法和关注的反映。rn本文的前提似乎是单租户,如果评估师仅专注于特定于房地产的因素,而不是一般的市场力量来评估市场价值,那么适合(或定制)商业房地产的价值可能会被高估。文章接着断言“对销售比较方法和收入资本化方法的组件的最佳支持是第二代空间。”如果自动默认为评估第一代空间,就好像它是第二代空间一样,则会忽略市场对该物业的接受。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Appraisal Journal》 |2009年第3期|274-286|共13页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:27:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号