首页> 外文期刊>Applied Surface Science >Monte Carlo simulations of electron transport in solids: applications to electron backscattering from surfaces
【24h】

Monte Carlo simulations of electron transport in solids: applications to electron backscattering from surfaces

机译:固体中电子传输的蒙特卡洛模拟:在表面电子反向散射中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We report results of Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the effects of backscattered electrons in scanning Auger microscopy (SAM) on the radial distributions of emitted Auger electrons. We considered the emission of copper M3VV and L3VV Auger electrons from a thin Cu overlayer on a substrate of silicon or g-old for primary electrons with energies of 5 and 10 keV that were normally incident on the sample. The Cu layer was assumed to be sufficiently thin that there were no changes in the angular and energy distributions of primary and backscattered electrons passing through the overlayer. We report values of the information radius, r(a)(p), from which a selected percentage P of the emitted Auger electron intensity originates. Values of found here range from 119 angstrom (Cu L3M45M45 Auger transition, Eo = 5 keV, Au substrate, P = 80) to 6757 angstrom (Cu M3VV Auger transition, E-0 = 10 keV Si substrate, P = 95). For the same substrate, primary energy, and chosen value of P, values of r(a)(P) are larger for Auger electrons from the Cu M3VV Auger transition than for the Cu L3M45M45 Auger transition. In addition, values of r(a)(p) increase with primary energy and are larger for the Si substrate than the Au substrate. The values of r(a)(p) are generally much larger than the radius of the primary beam (assumed to be 50 angstrom here) on account of inner-shell ionizations by backscattered electrons. We also report values of the mean escape radius, < r >, that range from 82.5 angstrom (Cu L3M45M45 Auger transition, E-0 = 5 keV, Au substrate) to 1169 angstrom (Cu M3VV Auger transition, E-0 = 10 keV. Si substrate). Knowledge of r(a)(p) and < r > is important in the analysis of fine features in SAM because appreciable Auger signal can be collected from the nearby region as well as from the feature of interest. Finally, we report Monte Carlo simulations of Auger line scans across the edge of a thin Cu overlayer on a Si or Au substrate. The shapes of the line scans depended only weakly on the Cu Auger transition, although the differences were more pronounced for the Si than the An substrate. On account of backscattered electrons, the lateral distance corresponding to signal variations of 25% and 75% of the maximum intensity in a line scan varied from 53.6 angstrom (Cu L3M45M45 transition, E-0 = 5 keV, Si substrate) to 75.1 angstrom (Cu M3VV transition, E-0 = 10 keV, Au substrate). (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们报告了蒙特卡洛模拟的结果,以研究扫描俄歇显微镜(SAM)中反向散射电子对发射俄歇电子的径向分布的影响。我们考虑了从硅或g-old衬底上的薄Cu覆盖层发出的M3VV和L3VV Auger铜电子的发射,这些电子通常入射在样品上,能量为5和10 keV。假定铜层足够薄,以至于穿过覆盖层的一次电子和反向散射电子的角度和能量分布都没有变化。我们报告了信息半径r(a)(p)的值,从该值得出发射的俄歇电子强度的选定百分比P。在此发现的值范围为119埃(Cu L3M45M45俄歇跃迁,Eo = 5 keV,Au衬底,P = 80)至6757埃(Cu M3VV俄歇跃迁,E-0 = 10 keV Si衬底,P = 95)。对于相同的基板,一次能量和P的选定值,来自Cu M3VV Auger跃迁的俄歇电子的r(a)(P)值大于Cu L3M45M45 Auger跃迁。另外,r(a)(p)的值随一次能量而增加,并且对于Si衬底而言比Au衬底大。由于背向散射电子使内壳电离,r(a)(p)的值通常远大于初级束的半径(这里假定为50埃)。我们还报告了平均逃逸半径的值,范围从82.5埃(Cu L3M45M45俄歇跃迁,E-0 = 5 keV,金基底)到1169埃(Cu M3VV俄歇跃迁,E-0 = 10 keV) Si基板)。 r(a)(p)和的知识对于分析SAM中的精细特征非常重要,因为可以从附近区域以及感兴趣的特征中收集可观的俄歇信号。最后,我们报告了在Si或Au基板上薄Cu覆盖层边缘进行的俄歇线扫描的蒙特卡洛模拟。线扫描的形状仅微弱地依赖于Cu Auger跃迁,尽管Si的差异比An基底的差异更为明显。由于存在反向散射电子,线扫描中对应于最大强度的25%和75%的信号变化的横向距离从53.6埃(Cu L3M45M45跃迁,E-0 = 5 keV,Si衬底)变化到75.1埃( Cu M3VV跃迁,E-0 = 10 keV,Au衬底)。 (c)2004 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号