...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied financial letters >Visiting an old battleground in empirical industrial organization: SCP versus NEIO
【24h】

Visiting an old battleground in empirical industrial organization: SCP versus NEIO

机译:参观经验型工业组织中的旧战场:SCP与NEIO

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are two principal approaches to analysing market power - the new empirical industrial organization (NEIO) approach and the structure-conduct-performance (SCP) approach. The existing literature on market power shows that there is no unanimous agreement on which of these two methods should be used to analyse the market power. Users seem to select whichever method is best suitable to their situation, such as data availability. Here we compare these two methods of analysing market power using a single US brewing industry data set and hypothesize that both the methods would yield identical results. On the basis of the empirical results, we conclude that the debate over the use of the SCP approach versus the use of the NEIO approach to analyse market power will continue.
机译:有两种主要的分析市场力量的方法-新的经验产业组织(NEIO)方法和结构行为绩效(SCP)方法。现有的有关市场支配力的文献表明,对于应使用这两种方法中的哪一种来分析市场支配力,没有达成一致的意见。用户似乎选择了最适合其情况的方法,例如数据可用性。在这里,我们比较了使用单个美国酿酒业数据集分析市场力量的这两种方法,并假设这两种方法将产生相同的结果。根据经验结果,我们得出结论,关于使用SCP方法与使用NEIO方法分析市场力量的辩论将继续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号