首页> 外文期刊>Applied financial economics >Do alternative UCITS deliver what they promise? A comparison of alternative UCITS and hedge funds
【24h】

Do alternative UCITS deliver what they promise? A comparison of alternative UCITS and hedge funds

机译:替代UCITS是否能兑现他们的承诺?替代UCITS和对冲基金的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We study the performance of alternative UCITS funds and account for potential survivorship biases in our sample in the best possible manner. Alternative UCITS funds offer similar raw returns but a lower volatility compared to offshore hedge funds. Single-index models show that alternative UCITS funds provide only marginal exposure to variations in hedge fund returns. Multifactor models indicate that the most important risk factors for both alternative UCITS funds and their matched hedge funds strategies are related to stock market risks, but alternative UCITS funds exhibit a lower exposure to these factors than hedge funds. Moreover, we find factor loadings on different risk factors, suggesting that alternative UCITS and hedge funds pursue different strategies. Finally, we assess the degree of the value added for an investor in terms of enhanced diversification benefits by implementing a spanning test and find that both groups are different asset classes with time-varying diversification properties.
机译:我们研究了替代UCITS基金的绩效,并以最佳方式解决了样本中的潜在生存偏差。与离岸对冲基金相比,另类UCITS基金提供类似的原始回报,但波动性较低。单指数模型表明,另类UCITS基金仅对冲了对冲基金收益的边际风险。多因素模型表明,对于另类UCITS基金及其匹配的对冲基金策略而言,最重要的风险因素均与股票市场风险有关,但与对冲基金相比,另类UCITS基金对这些因素的敞口更低。此外,我们发现不同风险因素的因素负荷,表明另类UCITS和对冲基金采用不同的策略。最后,我们通过进行跨度检验来评估投资者在增加多元化收益方面的增值程度,发现这两组都是具有随时间变化的多元化属性的不同资产类别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号