...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >An economic comparison of battery energy storage to conventional energy efficiency technologies in Colorado manufacturing facilities
【24h】

An economic comparison of battery energy storage to conventional energy efficiency technologies in Colorado manufacturing facilities

机译:科罗拉多州制造工厂中电池能量存储与传统能源效率技术的经济比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Battery energy storage (BES) is one of a set of technologies that can be considered to reduce electrical loads, and to realize economic value for industrial customers. To directly compare the energy savings and economic effectiveness of BES to more conventional energy efficiency technologies, this study collected detailed information regarding the electrical loads associated with four Colorado manufacturing facilities. These datasets were used to generate a set of three scenarios for each manufacturer: implementation of a BES system, implementation of a set of conventional energy efficiency recommendations, and the implementation of both BES and conventional energy efficiency technologies. Evaluating these scenarios' economic payback period allows for a direct comparison between the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency technologies and that of BES, demonstrates the costs and benefits of implementing both BES and energy efficiency technologies, and characterizes the effectiveness of potential incentives in improving economic payback. For all of the manufacturing facilities modeled, results demonstrate that BES is the least cost-effective among the energy efficiency technologies considered, but that simultaneous implementation of both BES and energy efficiency technologies has a negligible effect on the BES payback period. Incentives are demonstrated to be required for BES to achieve near-term payback period parity with more conventional energy efficiency technologies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:电池能量存储(BES)是可以考虑减少电气负载并为工业客户实现经济价值的一组技术之一。为了直接将BES的节能和经济效益与更常规的能源效率技术进行比较,本研究收集了与四个科罗拉多州制造设施相关的电力负荷的详细信息。这些数据集用于为每个制造商生成一组三个方案:实施BES系统,实施一组常规能效建议以及实施BES和常规能效技术。对这些方案的经济投资回收期进行评估,可以直接比较能源效率技术和BES的成本效益,展示实施BES和能源效率技术的成本和收益,并表征潜在激励措施在改善经济方面的有效性。回报。对于所有模型化的制造工厂,结果表明,BES在所考虑的能源效率技术中成本效益最低,但是同时实施BES和能源效率技术对BES的投资回收期的影响可忽略不计。事实证明,对于BES而言,与更传统的能源效率技术相比,要达到近期投资回收期的要求,就需要采取激励措施。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2016年第15期|133-139|共7页
  • 作者

    Nataf Kalen; Bradley Thomas H.;

  • 作者单位

    Colorado State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Campus Delivery 1374, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA;

    Colorado State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Campus Delivery 1374, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Battery storage; Demand reduction; Energy efficiency; Industrial;

    机译:电池存储;减少需求;能源效率;工业;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号