...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Carbon capture and storage: Lessons from a storage potential and localization analysis
【24h】

Carbon capture and storage: Lessons from a storage potential and localization analysis

机译:碳捕获和储存:来自储存潜力和本地化分析的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The challenges of climate change involve totally rethinking the world's energy system. In particular, CCS technologies are still presented as a solution to reach ambitious climate targets. However, avoiding the required Gt of CO2 emissions by investing in CCS technologies supposes the development of carbon storage capacities. This analysis, conducted with TIAM-FR and based on a wide review of geological storage potential and various data, aims to discuss the impact of this potential on the development of the CCS option. We also specify a scenario allowing the exclusion of onshore storage due to a hypothetic policy considering public resistance to onshore storage, and carbon transport costs variation effects. The implementation of CCS is less impacted by the level of carbon storage potential - except in the lowest case of availability - than by the type of sequestration site. However, the development of CCS is lower at the end of the period in the case of a decrease in carbon storage potential. Indeed, the question of type of storage site appears to have a greater impact, with an arbitrage between deep saline aquifers and depleted basins and enhanced recovery. Doubling the cost of carbon transport does not limit the penetration of carbon capture technologies, but it does impact the choice of site. Finally, a limitation of onshore storage could have a significant impact on the penetration of the CCS option. The explanation for this limited deployment of CCS is thus the higher cost of offshore storage more than the level of storage potential. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:气候变化的挑战涉及彻底重新思考世界的能源系统。特别是,仍将CCS技术作为实现雄心勃勃的气候目标的解决方案。但是,通过投资CCS技术来避免所需的CO2排放Gt假定碳存储能力的发展。这项分析是在TIAM-FR进行的基础上,对地质储藏潜力和各种数据进行了广泛回顾,旨在讨论这种潜力对CCS选件开发的影响。考虑到公众对陆上储存的抵制以及碳运输成本变化的影响,我们还提出了一种假想政策,允许排除陆上储存。与碳固存站点的类型相比,CCS的实施受碳储存潜力水平的影响较小(除非在可用性最低的情况下)。但是,在碳储存潜力降低的情况下,CCS的发展在该时期结束时较低。确实,储存地点类型的问题似乎产生了更大的影响,在深层盐水层和枯竭的盆地之间套利,提高了采收率。将碳运输成本提高一倍并不会限制碳捕集技术的普及,但确实会影响场地的选择。最后,陆上存储的限制可能会对CCS选项的普及产生重大影响。因此,对CCS的这种有限部署的解释是,离岸存储的成本高于存储潜力水平。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号