...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Representing cross-border trade of electricity in long-term energy-system optimization models with a limited geographical scope
【24h】

Representing cross-border trade of electricity in long-term energy-system optimization models with a limited geographical scope

机译:在地理范围有限的长期能源系统优化模型中代表电力的跨境贸易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Long-term energy system optimization models can be designed to model systems with a broad geographical scope that comprises multiple countries. However, due to computational limitations, often the geographical scope is restricted to a single country. This raises the problem of correctly accounting for cross-border trade of electricity in models with a limited geographical scope. Therefore, this paper assesses the impact of not correctly representing cross-border trade flows in geographically restricted long-term planning models. To this end, we use a planning model for the interconnected Central-Western European power system to compare technology choices and welfare estimates for Belgium when (i) cross-border trade of electricity is ignored and (ii) cross-border trade flows are an endogenous part of the planning model. Furthermore, this paper presents two sets of methodologies to account for transmission flows in planning models. A first methodology is to extend the model's geographical scope and fix the capacity variables in the neighboring countries in line with pre-designed scenarios for those countries. A second methodology further reduces the computational cost by using specially tailored import and export curves to represent each country's trade opportunities. The results indicate that for highly interconnected systems, neglecting cross-border trade or having a highly stylized representation of cross-border flows can lead to inaccurate welfare estimates and technology biases. In addition, a key insight presented in this paper is that congestion rents can constitute a major share of the welfare gains attained by trading electricity. Finally, endogenizing the dispatch decisions in neighboring countries is the most accurate method to deal with cross-border trade, while by correctly designing cross-border trade curves computational time can be reduced, but planning model outcomes become less accurate.
机译:可以设计长期能源系统优化模型,以对包含多个国家的广泛地理区域的系统进行建模。但是,由于计算限制,通常地理范围仅限于一个国家。这就提出了在地理范围有限的模型中正确考虑电力跨界贸易的问题。因此,本文评估了在受地理限制的长期计划模型中无法正确表示跨境贸易流的影响。为此,当(i)忽略了电力的跨境贸易并且(ii)跨境贸易流量是一个中欧和中欧之间互联的电力系统的规划模型时,我们将比较比利时的技术选择和福利估算。规划模型的内生部分。此外,本文提出了两种方法来解决规划模型中的传输流问题。第一种方法是扩大模型的地理范围,并根据针对这些国家的预先设计的方案来确定邻国的能力变量。第二种方法通过使用专门定制的进出口曲线代表每个国家的贸易机会,进一步降低了计算成本。结果表明,对于高度互连的系统,忽略跨境贸易或对跨境流动的高度程式化表示可能会导致福利估计和技术偏见不准确。此外,本文提出的一个重要见解是,拥挤租金可以构成通过电力交易获得的福利收益的主要部分。最后,将邻国的调度决策内生化是处理跨境贸易的最准确方法,而通过正确设计跨境贸易曲线,虽然可以减少计算时间,但规划模型的结果却不那么准确。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2020年第1期|114376.1-114376.21|共21页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Univ Leuven Dept Mech Engn TME Branch Celestijnenlaan 300 B-3001 Leuven Belgium|VITO Boeretang 200 B-2400 Mol Belgium|EnergyVille Thor Pk B-3600 Genk Belgium;

    Univ Leuven Dept Mech Engn TME Branch Celestijnenlaan 300 B-3001 Leuven Belgium|EnergyVille Thor Pk B-3600 Genk Belgium;

    VITO Boeretang 200 B-2400 Mol Belgium|EnergyVille Thor Pk B-3600 Genk Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Long-term power system planning; Energy-system optimization models; Cross-border trade; Transmission networks; Geographical scope;

    机译:长期电力系统规划;能源系统优化模型;跨境贸易;传输网络;地理范围;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号