首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Flow regime aspects in determining environmental flows and maximising energy production at run-of-river hydropower plants
【24h】

Flow regime aspects in determining environmental flows and maximising energy production at run-of-river hydropower plants

机译:确定河流上游水力发电厂的环境流量并最大程度提高能源生产的流量状况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates the influence of the river flow regime type on the e-flows releases and hydropower production, constrained by eight hydrologically-based e-flows methods. For this purpose, 20 run-of-river hydropower plants up to 10 MW, from five Iberian Peninsula basins, located in regions with pluvial highly fluctuating, pluvial stable, pluvial winter, and pluvio-nival flow regimes were analysed. We integrated a hydropower model with a hydrological model, and eight e-flows methods to estimate mean daily hydropower production, e-flows, and hydrologic alteration. The results demonstrate little influence on hydropower production and e-flows releases for the pluvial regime type, notably, pluvial stable regime river reaches. Pluvio-nival regime provides unstable hydropower production and comparatively high e-flows alteration. Overall, hydrologic parameters represented by five global indices derived from Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration were affected differently for the e-flows releases regime induced by tested e-flows methods. In general, e-flows methods that involve annual minimum flow and indices of flow duration curve show inconsistent results among all study cases and hydrological regimes types; either they result in high e-flows releases while sharply reducing hydropower production or vice versa. However, so-called dynamic approaches demonstrate consistent results and are more suitable, both in terms of hydropower production and e-flows releases by therefore providing 10-35% more energy production while having little impact in several hydrological parameters. The findings of this study may serve as a starting point to initiate a new discussion on the methods and criteria that should be established regarding e-flows determination at run-of-river hydropower plants.
机译:这项研究调查了河流水流类型对电子水流释放和水力发电的影响,受八种基于水文的电子水流方法的约束。为此,分析了五个伊比利亚半岛盆地中20个功率最高为10 MW的河流上游水力发电厂,这些水力发源地位于河流高度波动,河流稳定,河流冬季和河流-新生流域。我们将水电模型与水文模型和八种电子流方法集成在一起,以估算平均每日水电发电量,电子流和水文变化。结果表明,对于河流政权类型,尤其是河流稳定政权河段,对水力发电和电子流释放几乎没有影响。潮汐-新政制度提供了不稳定的水力发电和相对较高的电子流变化。总体而言,由水文变化指标得出的五个全球指数所代表的水文参数,对于通过测试的电子水流方法诱发的电子水流释放机制的影响不同。通常,涉及年度最小流量和流量持续时间曲线指标的电子流量方法在所有研究案例和水文体制类型之间的结果不一致。它们会导致大量的电子流量释放,同时会大大降低水力发电量,反之亦然。但是,所谓的动态方法在水力发电和电子流量释放方面都显示出一致的结果,并且更合适,因为这样可以增加10-35%的能源产量,而对几个水文参数的影响却很小。这项研究的结果可以作为起点,开始就应在河流上游水力发电厂确定流量确定的方法和标准进行新的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号