首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems
【24h】

Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems

机译:增强型地热系统的复合功率循环的优化和适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Both thermodynamic performance and techno-economic analysis of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems have been investigated in this study. Thermodynamic analysis were carried out for four power generation systems: single-flash (SF) system, double-flash (DF) system, flash-ORC (FORC) system; and double-flashORC (DFORC) system. By choosing the maximum net power output as an objective function, optimization is done based on comparisons among the four systems with a goal of increasing the net power output by 20% under the condition that the SF is replaced by one of the compound systems (DF, FORC, and DFORC). As an original contribution, five maps useful for real applications have been generated for selecting optimum geothermal power cycles under different geofluid's conditions, with consideration of five ORC working fluids (R123, R152a, isobutane, n pentane and R245fa). The boundaries that determine whether the compound systems have advantages over the SF system are functions of the geofluid temperature, geofluid dryness, and the type of the working fluid used by the ORC. In the techno-economic study, Levelized Electricity Cost (LEC) and Payback Period (PBP) analyses were carried out. The results from the LEC and PBP studies show good agreement. For the three scenarios analyzed, each of the compound power systems has a better engineering economic performance than the SF system. For the "common" heat source condition investigated, comparison among the three compound systems shows that the DF system has a lowest levelized electricity cost and the shortest payback period; the FORC and DFORC show similar techno-economic performance and have advantages over the SF system.
机译:在这项研究中,已经研究了增强地热系统的复合动力循环的热力学性能和技术经济分析。对四种发电系统进行了热力学分析:单闪(SF)系统,双闪(DF)系统,闪ORC(FORC)系统;和双FlashORC(DFORC)系统。通过选择最大净功率输出作为目标函数,基于四个系统之间的比较来进行优化,目标是在用一个复合系统(DF)代替SF的情况下将净功率输出提高20%。 ,FORC和DFORC)。作为最初的贡献,在考虑到五种ORC工作流体(R123,R152a,异丁烷,正戊烷和R245fa)的情况下,已经生成了五张对于实际应用有用的图,用于选择最佳地热发电条件。确定复合系统是否优于SF系统的边界是土流温度,土流干燥度以及ORC使用的工作流体类型的函数。在技​​术经济研究中,进行了平均电费(LEC)和投资回收期(PBP)分析。 LEC和PBP研究的结果显示出很好的一致性。对于所分析的三种情况,每个复合动力系统都比SF系统具有更好的工程经济性能。对于所研究的“常见”热源条件,三种复合系统之间的比较表明,DF系统的平均电费最低,投资回收期最短; FORC和DFORC表现出相似的技术经济表现,并且比SF系统具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号