首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Are emission reduction policies effective under climate change conditions? A backcasting and exploratory scenario approach using the LEAP-OSeMOSYS Model
【24h】

Are emission reduction policies effective under climate change conditions? A backcasting and exploratory scenario approach using the LEAP-OSeMOSYS Model

机译:减排政策在气候变化条件下是否有效?使用LEAP-OSeMOSYS模型的回溯和探索性方案方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The power sector exercises huge impacts on global warming through emitted greenhouse gases (GHGs), with Australia not an exception. Over the years, the effectiveness of policies that have emerged to curtail GHGs emissions from electricity generation seem barely investigated. To address this gap, the study identifies potential energy reduction policies and climate change scenarios for the Australian power sector by applying approaches from combined backcasting and exploratory scenario. The Long-range Energy Alternative Planning (LEAP) system and its integrated Open Source Energy Modelling System (OSeMOSYS) was used for optimisation analysis. Results identified cost optimisation scenarios as a least-cost generation pathway with less climate change impact, followed by renewable energy target and energy productivity scenarios. Economic analysis shows that emission reduction policy will result in added cost to the economy, while carbon tax policies will yield economic benefit in installation cost, resource savings and environmental externalities reductions by 2050. The environmental analysis reveals that emission reduction policy will increase cumulative emissions, while future temperatures may double the emissions from the base case scenario. We conclude that future low-carbon pathways lie in clean energy substitutions and innovative energy policies, while global warming raises the need to switch to clean energy technologies early.
机译:电力行业通过排放温室气体(GHG)对全球变暖产生了巨大影响,澳大利亚也不例外。多年来,似乎很少研究减少电力产生的温室气体排放的政策的有效性。为了弥补这一差距,该研究通过采用结合了反向预测和探索性情景的方法,确定了澳大利亚电力行业的潜在节能政策和气候变化情景。远程能源替代计划(LEAP)系统及其集成的开源能源建模系统(OSeMOSYS)用于优化分析。结果将成本优化方案确定为成本最低的途径,对气候变化的影响较小,其次是可再生能源目标和能源生产率方案。经济分析表明,减排政策将导致经济增加成本,而碳税政策将在2050年之前带来安装成本,资源节省和环境外部性减少方面的经济利益。环境分析表明,减排政策将增加累积排放量,而未来的温度可能会使基本情况下的排放量增加一倍。我们得出的结论是,未来的低碳途径在于清洁能源的替代和创新能源政策,而全球变暖提出了及早转向清洁能源技术的需求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2019年第15期|1183-1217|共35页
  • 作者单位

    James Cook Univ, Div Trop Environm & Soc, Coll Business Law & Governance, Econ & Mkt Acad Grp, POB 6811, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia;

    James Cook Univ, Div Trop Environm & Soc, Coll Business Law & Governance, Econ & Mkt Acad Grp, POB 6811, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia;

    James Cook Univ, Div Trop Environm & Soc, Coll Business Law & Governance, Dept Econ, POB 6811, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    LEAP; OSeMOSYS; Australia; Climate change; Emission reduction policy; Optimisation;

    机译:LEAP;OSeMOSYS;澳大利亚;气候变化;减排政策;优化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号