...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Economics >Assessing economic convergence in the EU: is there a perspective for the 'cohesion countries'?
【24h】

Assessing economic convergence in the EU: is there a perspective for the 'cohesion countries'?

机译:评估欧盟的经济趋同:“凝聚国家”是否有前景?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article analyses the stochastic income convergence within the EU-15. The empirical analysis uses per capita GDP, in PPP and in constant prices of 2005 for the period 1950 to 2010. Apart from the traditional DF type tests we also account for possible structural changes. In this direction, we employ the Zivot-Andrews (1992) and the Lee-Strazicich (1999, 2003) testing procedures, for one and two breaks, endogenously determined. Furthermore, we apply the Carlino and Mills (1993) methodology proposed for the detection of β-convergence. The overall evidence supports the existence of two discrete clubs, the first by the 'cohesion countries' (Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain) and the second by the remaining members. In particular, there is a clear evidence of convergence within each club, whereas between clubs there is a luck of catching-up effects. Furthermore, investigation of correlation between relative per capita GDP of each country and several factors that are often identified as growth stimulants, namely Total Factor Productivity, FDI, investment and openness confirm, with the exception of Greece, a strong association between these factors and the convergence process. However, progress in the convergence has not been uniform across countries and over time, reflecting the specific interactions between domestic and international factors and their impact on the convergence process of individual countries.
机译:本文分析了欧盟15国内部的随机收入趋同。实证分析使用的是1950年至2010年期间的人均GDP(按购买力平价和2005年不变价格计算)。除传统的DF类型检验外,我们还考虑了可能的结构变化。在这个方向上,我们采用Zivot-Andrews(1992)和Lee-Strazicich(1999,2003)的测试程序,内生确定了一个和两个中断。此外,我们应用了提议的Carlino和Mills(1993)方法来检测β收敛。总体证据支持两个独立俱乐部的存在,第一个由“凝聚力国家”(葡萄牙,爱尔兰,希腊和西班牙)组成,第二个由其余成员组成。特别是,每个俱乐部内部都有明显的趋同迹象,而俱乐部之间存在赶超效应。此外,对每个国家的相对人均GDP与通常被认为是增长刺激因素的几个因素之间的相关性进行调查,即全要素生产率,外国直接投资,投资和开放度,除希腊外,这些因素与收敛过程。但是,随着时间的推移,各国之间的融合进展并不统一,这反映了国内和国际因素之间的具体相互作用及其对单个国家融合进程的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Economics》 |2014年第33期|4025-4040|共16页
  • 作者

    X. Chapsa; C. Katrakilidis;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 213, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece,Department of Business Administration, Technological Educational Institute of Serres, Serves, Greece;

    Department of Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 213, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    unit root tests; structural breaks; convergence; EU;

    机译:单位根测试;结构性断裂;收敛;欧洲联盟;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号