...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Economics >Private or public school advantage? Evidence from 40 countries using PISA 2012-Mathematics
【24h】

Private or public school advantage? Evidence from 40 countries using PISA 2012-Mathematics

机译:私立或公立学校的优势?使用PISA 2012的来自40个国家的证据-数学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is known that in most countries, private school students outperform students in public schools in international assessments. However, the empirical literature recognizes that assessing the true effect of private school attendance requires addressing selection and sorting issues on both observabland unobservables. The existing empirical evidence on the private school effect mostly covers OECD and Latin American countries, with little evidence on other parts of the world. There is recent emerging country-specific evidence doubting the existence of a private school advantage. I use PISA 2012 data for Mathematics and two different methodologies to derive baseline and bias-corrected estimates of the private-dependent and independent school effect for 40 countries. A robust private school advantage is found only in a handful of countries. Public schools generally perform as well as private subsidized schools and outperform independent schools. Accounting for both peer effects and selection is necessary when evaluating school effectiveness, especially in the case of independent schools.
机译:众所周知,在大多数国家,私立学校的学生在国际评估中都比公立学校的学生好。但是,经验文献认识到,评估私立学校出勤的真实效果需要解决两个观察站无法观察到的选择和分类问题。现有的关于私立学校效应的经验证据主要涵盖经合组织和拉丁美洲国家,很少有关于世界其他地区的证据。最近有针对特定国家的新兴证据怀疑私立学校优势的存在。我使用PISA 2012的数学数据和两种不同的方法,得出了40个国家对私人依赖和独立学校的影响的基线和经偏差校正的估计。仅在少数几个国家中发现了强大的私立学校优势。公立学校的表现通常与私立学校一样好,并且表现优于私立学校。在评估学校效果时,尤其是在私立学校的情况下,必须考虑同peer影响和选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号