...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Economics >Moving to autarky, trade creation and home market effect: an exhaustive analysis of regional trade agreements in Africa
【24h】

Moving to autarky, trade creation and home market effect: an exhaustive analysis of regional trade agreements in Africa

机译:转向自给自足,贸易创造和国内市场效应:对非洲区域贸易协定的详尽分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article analyses the effects of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) on bilateral trade in Africa. A structural gravity equation is estimated over the period 1955-2014. The overall effect of RTAs on African trade is strong, but depending on the nature of the RTAs, there is a decreasing impact over time. While Economic Integration Agreements (EIAs) still favour trade in Africa, there was no trade creation coming from Free Trade Agreements between 1990 and 2014. However, the provisions of RTAs do not have a negative impact on trade: agreements that include behind-the-border policies do not significantly deter bilateral trade. To explain the declining impact of RTAs, we look at their redistributive impact between members states. There is no evidence that large countries disproportionally export diversified goods due to RTAs (no 'home effect'). Countries with a good international network ('hub effect') benefited more than other countries of RTAs between 1955 and 1990 but this is however less true on the most recent period (1990-2014).
机译:本文分析了区域贸易协定(RTAs)对非洲双边贸易的影响。在1955-2014年期间估算了结构重力方程。区域贸易协定对非洲贸易的总体影响是巨大的,但根据区域贸易协定的性质,其影响会随着时间而逐渐减少。尽管经济一体化协议(EIA)仍然有利于非洲贸易,但1990年至2014年之间没有自由贸易协议带来的贸易创造。但是,RTAs的规定不会对贸易产生负面影响:协议包括边境政策并未显着阻碍双边贸易。为了解释RTAs的下降影响,我们查看它们在成员国之间的再分配影响。没有证据表明,由于区域贸易协定,大国不成比例地出口了多种商品(没有“家庭效应”)。在1955年至1990年期间,拥有良好国际网络(“集线效应”)的国家比其他区域贸易协定国家受益更多,但是在最近时期(1990-2014年)却不是这样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号