首页> 外文期刊>Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society journal >A Comparison between Vector Algorithm and CRSS Algorithms for Indoor Localization using Received Signal Strength
【24h】

A Comparison between Vector Algorithm and CRSS Algorithms for Indoor Localization using Received Signal Strength

机译:基于接收信号强度的室内定位矢量算法与CRSS算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A comparison is presented between two indoor localization algorithms using received signal strength, namely the vector algorithm and the Comparative Received Signal Strength (CRSS) algorithm. Signal values were obtained using ray tracing software and processed with MATLAB to ascertain the effects on localization accuracy of radio map resolution, number of access points and operating frequency. The vector algorithm outperforms the CRSS algorithm, which suffers from ambiguity, although that can be reduced by using more access points and a higher operating frequency. Ambiguity is worsened by the addition of more reference points. The vector algorithm performance is enhanced by adding more access points and reference points while it degrades with increasing frequency provided that the statistical mean of error increased to about 60 cm for most studied cases.
机译:使用接收信号强度的两种室内定位算法,即矢量算法和比较接收信号强度(CRSS)算法,进行了比较。使用射线追踪软件获得信号值,并用MATLAB进行处理,以确定对无线电地图分辨率,接入点数量和工作频率的定位精度的影响。矢量算法的性能优于CRSS算法,后者具有歧义性,尽管可以通过使用更多的接入点和更高的工作频率来降低​​这种算法。添加更多参考点会使歧义性恶化。通过增加更多的访问点和参考点,可以提高矢量算法的性能,而随着频率的增加,矢量算法的性能将下降,前提是在大多数研究情况下,错误的统计平均值增加到约60 cm。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号