首页> 外文期刊>APICS >Tete-a-Tete
【24h】

Tete-a-Tete

机译:面对面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I once was asked, "Which is the better place to work-a private company or a public one?" It was a logical and highly relevant question, as the inquiring student had a job offer from both types of organizations. At first, I was tempted to point out that there are no absolutes and that there is good and bad in everything. But then I thought about the fact that private and public companies do have specific characteristics that might influence a young professional's decision-if that person is lucky enough to have a choice. "Publicly traded companies have to abide by Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations," I began. "They also must use generally accepted accounting principles. If any of these organizations cause trouble, the SEC or Congress quickly adds new regulations. These factors can cause public companies to exhibit a sameness that may reduce opportunities for creativity."
机译:曾经有人问我:“私营公司或上市公司是哪个更好的工作场所?”这是一个合乎逻辑且高度相关的问题,因为正在调查的学生从这两种类型的组织都获得了工作机会。起初,我很想指出,没有绝对的东西,并且每件事都有好有坏。但是后来我想到了一个事实,即私营公司和上市公司确实具有可能影响年轻专业人士决策的特定特征,如果该人足够幸运的话可以选择。我开始说:“上市公司必须遵守美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的规定。” “他们还必须使用公认的会计原则。如果这些组织中的任何一个引起麻烦,美国证券交易委员会或国会都会迅速增加新的规定。这些因素可能导致上市公司表现出相同性,从而可能减少创造机会。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《APICS》 |2015年第4期|52-52|共1页
  • 作者

    Randall Schaefer;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号