首页> 外文期刊>Antipode >The Subsumption of Space and the Spatiality of Subsumption: Primitive Accumulation and the Transition to Capitalism in Shanghai, China
【24h】

The Subsumption of Space and the Spatiality of Subsumption: Primitive Accumulation and the Transition to Capitalism in Shanghai, China

机译:空间的包容和包容的空间:原始积累与向上海的资本主义过渡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on extensive interviews, this study is the first systematic attempt to map the spatio-temporal evolution of production networks linking urban, state-owned enterprises and rural, township and village-owned enterprises in reform-era China. It identifies two distinct regimes of urban-to-rural subcontracting patterns and conventions. The first, which developed and prospered from the mid-1980s until the mid-1990s, brought rural workers and the countryside into a relatively extensive relationship with urban capital, and thus represented a partial transition to capitalism. Its violent reconfiguration in the wake of a series of sectoral crises in the late 1990s led to the widespread privatisation of rural enterprises, and the emergence and consolidation of a second regime that simultaneously constituted a significant intensification of relations, the capture of the rural by the urban, and a new stage in this region's transition. This paper argues that these regimes are analogous to the formal and real subsumption of labor to capital, respectively, and that subsumption may be a more useful analytic for understanding the process of capture and transition than primitive accumulation: the latter concept alone, without reference to the dynamics of the social/spatial division of labor, risks missing other ways that exploitive connections can be constructed between places. This paper thus seeks to recast the relationship between these two concepts, and to develop a larger vocabulary in which subsumption, like primitive accumulation, is both spatial and ongoing and internal to capitalist accumulation.
机译:在广泛访谈的基础上,本研究是首次系统地绘制了改革时代中国城市,国有企业与农村,乡镇和乡村企业之间联系的生产网络的时空演变图。它确定了城乡分包模式和惯例的两种不同制度。第一个从1980年代中期到1990年代中期发展并繁荣起来,使农民工和农村与城市资本建立了相对广泛的关系,从而代表了向资本主义的部分过渡。在1990年代后期发生一系列部门危机之后,该国进行了剧烈的重组,导致农村企业普遍私有化,第二个政权的出现和巩固,同时又构成了一种关系的显着强化,即农村地区对农村的占领。城市,这是该地区转型的新阶段。本文认为,这些制度分别类似于将劳动力正式地和实际地包含在资本中,对于理解俘获和过渡的过程而言,与原始积累相比,这种消耗可能是更有用的分析方法:仅是后者,而不涉及原始的概念。社会/空间分工的动态,可能会错过其他方式,可能在地方之间建立剥削性联系。因此,本文力图重铸这两个概念之间的关系,并发展出一个更大的词汇表,其中包括原始积累在内的包容既是空间上的又是持续的,并且是资本主义积累的内部。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号