首页> 外文期刊>Annals of tourism research >Why Heidegger did not travel: Existential angst, authenticity, and tourist experiences
【24h】

Why Heidegger did not travel: Existential angst, authenticity, and tourist experiences

机译:海德格尔为何不旅行:存在的焦虑,真实性和游客体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"Authenticity" continues to be debated within tourism studies, as seers in the extensive number of articles published in ATR since 1999 on this subject. Advocates of existential authenticity have used the work of the German philosopher Martin Heidegger to argue that tourists seek experiences that counter the emptiness of everyday life in modern societies and provide them an opportunity to be more authentic. This is, however, based on a partial reading of Heidegger. His work implicitly questions the efficacy of travel as a means of experiencing a greater awareness of one's own place in the world and explicitly rejects cosmopolitanism as a worldview. Rather than a new intervention, 'existential authenticity' is a return to a familiar travel/tourist dichotomy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:自1999年以来,在ATR上发表了大量关于该主题的文章的观察者中,“真实性”一直在旅游学研究中争论不休。提倡存在真实性的倡导者利用德国哲学家马丁·海德格尔(Martin Heidegger)的作品来论证,游客寻求的体验可以抵消现代社会日常生活的空虚,并为他们提供更真实的机会。但是,这是基于对海德格尔的部分阅读而得出的。他的工作隐含地质疑旅行作为一种手段来增强人们对自己在世界上的地位的认识的效力,并明确拒绝世界主义作为一种世界观。 “存在的真实性”不是对新的干预,而是对熟悉的旅行/游客二分法的回归。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号