首页> 外文期刊>Annals of tourism research >Irreconcilable differences: Divorcing ethics from existential authenticity
【24h】

Irreconcilable differences: Divorcing ethics from existential authenticity

机译:不可调和的差异:从存在性真实性中解散道德规范

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper challenges tourism research that attempts to bring together existential authenticity and ethics. Following on from others who have revived philosophically driven investigations of authenticity, we turn to key existential thinkers to specifically assess the ethical deficit of existential phenomenology. Doing so reveals Simone de Beauvoir to be unique in her development of an existential ethics. However, this does not fully allow us to reconcile existential authenticity with ethics in the existing tourism literature, as existential philosophy tells us that unethical actions can be authentic and ethical actions can be in inauthentic. Identifying these irreconcilable differences, we argue that future research on ethics and authenticity must be more firmly grounded in the concepts of freedom, ambiguity, and intentionality. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文挑战旅游研究试图带来存在的真实性和道德。 在恢复哲学驱动的真实性调查的其他人之后,我们转向关键存在的思想家,专门评估存在性现象学的道德缺陷。 这样做揭示了Simone de Beauvoir在她的存在性道德的发展中是独一无二的。 然而,这并没有完全允许我们与现有旅游文学中的伦理协调,因为存在的哲学告诉我们,不道德的行为可以是真实的,道德行动可以是不真实的。 确定这些不可调和的差异,我们认为未来的道德和真实性研究必须更加坚定地以自由,歧义和意向性的概念。 (c)2021 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号