...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences >Environmental Impacts and Costs of Energy
【24h】

Environmental Impacts and Costs of Energy

机译:环境影响和能源成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Environmental damage is one of the main justifications for continued efforts to reduce energy consumption and to shift to cleaner sources such as solar energy. In recent years there has been much progress in the analysis of environmental damages, in particular thanks to the Extern E (External Costs of Energy) Project of the European Commission. This article presents a summary of the methodology and key results for the external costs of the major energy technologies. Even though the uncertainties are large, the results provide substantial evidence that the classical air pollutants (particles, No_x, and SO_2) from fossil fuels impose significant public health costs, comparable to the cost of global warming from CO_2 emissions. The total external costs are relatively low for natural gas (in the range of about 0.5-1 eurocents/kWh for most EU countries), but much higher for coal and lignite (in the range of about 2-6 eurocents/kWh for most EU countries). By contrast, the external costs of nuclear, wind, and photovoltaics are very low. The external costs of hydro are extremely variable from site to site, and the ones of biomass depend strongly on the specific technologies used and can be quite large for combustion.
机译:环境损害是继续努力减少能源消耗并转向使用清洁能源(例如太阳能)的主要理由之一。近年来,尤其是在欧洲委员会的Extern E(能源外部成本)项目的推动下,环境损害的分析取得了很大进展。本文概述了主要能源技术的外部成本的方法和主要结果。即使不确定性很大,结果仍提供了充分的证据,表明化石燃料产生的经典空气污染物(颗粒,No_x和SO_2)造成了可观的公共卫生成本,与CO_2排放造成的全球变暖成本相当。天然气的外部总成本相对较低(大多数欧盟国家约为0.5-1欧分/ kWh),而煤炭和褐煤的成本更高(大多数欧盟约为2-6欧分/ kWh)国家)。相比之下,核能,风能和光伏发电的外部成本非常低。水力发电的外部成本因地点而异,生物质的成本很大程度上取决于所使用的特定技术,并且燃烧的成本可能很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号