...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences >The risk/benefit of predicting a post-antibiotic era: Is the alarm working?
【24h】

The risk/benefit of predicting a post-antibiotic era: Is the alarm working?

机译:预测后抗生素时代的风险/益处:警报有效吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There have been concerns about antimicrobial resistance since the first widespread use of antibiotics in humans. More recently, this concern has grown and become the focus of clinical, scientific, and political activity. In part, the political interest is a consequence of publicizing a bleak picture of a post-antibiotic world. There are, however, dangers in using a discourse of fear. In this article, we discuss whether the evidence base is available to justify such claims and, more importantly, put this in the policy context with which it is used. Many governments now use a risk assessment approach to identify security concerns, based on reasonable worst-case scenarios. There is no doubt that for effective policy-based action to occur, antimicrobial resistance needs to be seen as a national and international security priority, particularly as the major cost of inaction will mostly be felt in the future. We conclude that presenting the evidence in a manner that is used to encourage prioritization of security policy is not only justified, it is essential to drive action in this area.
机译:自从抗生素在人类中首次广泛使用以来,一直存在对抗菌素耐药性的担忧。最近,这种关注已经增长,并成为临床,科学和政治活动的焦点。在某种程度上,政治利益是宣传后抗生素世界惨淡景象的结果。但是,使用恐惧话语存在危险。在本文中,我们讨论了证据基础是否可用于证明此类主张的合理性,更重要的是,将其放在使用该主张的政策环境中。许多政府现在基于合理的最坏情况,使用风险评估方法来确定安全问题。毫无疑问,要想采取有效的基于政策的行动,就必须将抗菌素耐药性视为国家和国际安全的优先事项,特别是因为将来无所作为的主要代价。我们得出的结论是,以鼓励优先考虑安全策略的方式提供证据不仅是合理的,而且必须在这一领域采取行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号