首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Occupational Hygiene, The >Solid versus Liquid Particle Sampling Efficiency of Three Personal Aerosol Samplers when Facing the Wind
【24h】

Solid versus Liquid Particle Sampling Efficiency of Three Personal Aerosol Samplers when Facing the Wind

机译:面对风时三个个人气溶胶采样器的固体与液体颗粒采样效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of this study was to examine the facing-the-wind sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers as a function of particle phase (solid versus liquid). Samplers examined were the IOM, Button, and a prototype personal high-flow inhalable sampler head (PHISH). The prototype PHISH was designed to interface with the 37-mm closed-face cassette and provide an inhalable sample at 10 l min−1 of flow. Increased flow rate increases the amount of mass collected during a typical work shift and helps to ensure that limits of detection are met, particularly for well-controlled but highly toxic species. Two PHISH prototypes were tested: one with a screened inlet and one with a single-pore open-face inlet. Personal aerosol samplers were tested on a bluff-body disc that was rotated along the facing-the-wind axis to reduce spatiotemporal variability associated with sampling supermicron aerosol in low-velocity wind tunnels. When compared to published data for facing-wind aspiration efficiency for a mouth-breathing mannequin, the IOM oversampled relative to mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency for all sizes and particle types (solid and liquid). The sampling efficiency of the Button sampler was closer to the mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency than the IOM for solid particles, but the screened inlet removed most liquid particles, resulting in a large underestimation compared to the mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency. The open-face PHISH results showed overestimation for solid particles and underestimation for liquid particles when compared to the mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency. Substantial (and statistically significant) differences in sampling efficiency were observed between liquid and solid particles, particularly for the Button and screened-PHISH, with a majority of aerosol mass depositing on the screened inlets of these samplers. Our results suggest that large droplets have low penetration efficiencies through screened inlets and that particle bounce, for solid particles, is an important determinant of aspiration and sampling efficiencies for samplers with screened inlets.
机译:这项研究的目的是检验三个个人气溶胶采样器的迎风采样效率与颗粒相(固体与液体)的关系。检查的采样器是IOM,Button和个人高流量可吸入采样器样头(PHISH)。 PHISH原型被设计为与37毫米封闭式暗盒接口,并在10 l min -1 流量下提供可吸入的样品。流速的增加会增加典型工作班次中收集到的质量,并有助于确保满足检测极限,尤其是对于受到良好控制但剧毒的物种。测试了两个PHISH原型:一个带有屏蔽入口,另一个带有单孔开口入口。在沿风向轴旋转的钝体圆盘上测试了个人气溶胶采样器,以减少与在低速风洞中采样超细气溶胶相关的时空变化。当与已发表的口呼吸人体模型的面对风抽吸效率数据进行比较时,IOM相对于所有尺寸和颗粒类型(固体和液体)的人体模型面对风抽吸效率进行了超采样。与固体颗粒的IOM相比,Button采样器的采样效率更接近于人体模型的风速抽吸效率,但是经过筛分的入口去除了大多数液体颗粒,与人体模型的风速抽吸相比,这大大低估了采样率效率。与人体模型面对风的抽吸效率相比,敞开式PHISH结果显示对固体颗粒的高估和对液体颗粒的低估。在液体和固体颗粒之间观察到采样效率的显着(且在统计上显着)差异,尤其是对于Button和经筛选的PHISH而言,大多数气溶胶沉积在这些采样器的经筛选入口上。我们的结果表明,大液滴通过筛分入口的渗透效率较低,对于固体颗粒,颗粒反弹是决定带筛分入口采样器抽吸和采样效率的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号