...
首页> 外文期刊>Annales Geophysicae >Comparison of high-latitude thermospheric meridional winds I: optical and radar experimental comparisons
【24h】

Comparison of high-latitude thermospheric meridional winds I: optical and radar experimental comparisons

机译:高纬度热层子午风的比较I:光学和雷达的实验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Thermospheric neutral winds at Kiruna, Sweden (67.4° N, 20.4° E) are compared using both direct optical Fabry-Perot Interferometer (FPI) measurements and those derived from European incoherent scatter radar (EISCAT) measurements. This combination of experimental data sets, both covering well over a solar cycle of data, allows for a unique comparison of the thermospheric meridional component of the neutral wind as observed by different experimental techniques. Uniquely in this study the EISCAT measurements are used to provide winds for comparison using two separate techniques: the most popular method based on the work of Salah and Holt (1974) and the Meridional Wind Model (MWM) (Miller et al., 1997) application of servo theory. The balance of forces at this location that produces the observed diurnal pattern are investigated using output from the Coupled Thermosphere and Ionosphere (CTIM) numerical model. Along with detailed comparisons from short periods the climatological behaviour of the winds have been investigated for seasonal and solar cycle dependence using the experimental techniques. While there are features which are consistent between the 3 techniques, such as the evidence of the equinoctial asymmetry, there are also significant differences between the techniques both in terms of trends and absolute values. It is clear from this and previous studies that the high-latitude representation of the thermospheric neutral winds from the empirical Horizontal Wind Model (HWM), though improved from earlier versions, lacks accuracy in many conditions. The relative merits of each technique are discussed and while none of the techniques provides the perfect data set to address model performance at high-latitude, one or more needs to be included in future HWM reformulations.
机译:使用直接光学法布里-珀罗干涉仪(FPI)测量值和源自欧洲非相干散射雷达(EISCAT)测量值的方法,比较了瑞典基律纳(67.4°N,20.4°E)的热层中性风。实验数据集的这种组合都覆盖了整个太阳周期的数据,可以通过不同的实验技术对中性风的热层子午分量进行独特的比较。在这项研究中独特的是,EISCAT测量用于通过两种单独的技术来提供风的比较:基于Salah和Holt(1974)的最流行方法以及子午风模型(MWM)(Miller等,1997)伺服理论的应用。使用热电离层耦合数值模型的输出,研究了在该位置产生的观测到的昼夜模式的力平衡。除了进行短期的详细比较外,还使用实验技术研究了风的气候行为对季节和太阳周期的依赖性。虽然这三种技术之间的特征是一致的,例如等时不对称的证据,但在趋势和绝对值方面,这两种技术之间也存在显着差异。从这项研究和以前的研究中可以清楚地看出,经验水平风模型(HWM)对热层中性风的高纬度表示,尽管相对于早期版本有所改进,但在许多情况下都缺乏准确性。讨论了每种技术的相对优点,尽管没有一种技术可以提供完美的数据集来解决高纬度模型的性能,但未来的HWM公式中需要包含一个或多个。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号