首页> 外文期刊>Annales Geophysicae >Comparison of accelerometer data calibration methods used in thermospheric neutral density estimation
【24h】

Comparison of accelerometer data calibration methods used in thermospheric neutral density estimation

机译:热球中性密度估算中使用加速度计数据校准方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ultra-sensitive space-borne accelerometers on board of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites are used to measure non-gravitational forces acting on the surface of these satellites. These forces consist of the Earth radiation pressure, the solar radiation pressure and the atmospheric drag, where the first two are caused by the radiation emitted from the Earth and the Sun, respectively, and the latter is related to the thermospheric density. On-board accelerometer measurements contain systematic errors, which need to be mitigated by applying a calibration before their use in gravity recovery or thermospheric neutral density estimations. Therefore, we improve, apply and compare three calibration procedures: (1) a multi-step numerical estimation approach, which is based on the numerical differentiation of the kinematic orbits of LEO satellites; (2) a calibration of accelerometer observations within the dynamic precise orbit determination procedure and (3) a comparison of observed to modeled forces acting on the surface of LEO satellites. Here, accelerometer measurements obtained by the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) are used. Time series of bias and scale factor derived from the three calibration procedures are found to be different in timescales of a few days to months. Results are more similar (statistically significant) when considering longer timescales, from which the results of approach (1) and (2) show better agreement to those of approach (3) during medium and high solar activity. Calibrated accelerometer observations are then applied to estimate thermospheric neutral densities. Differences between accelerometer-based density estimations and those from empirical neutral density models, e.g., NRLMSISE-00, are observed to be significant during quiet periods, on average 22 % of the simulated densities (during low solar activity), and up to 28 % during high solar activity. Therefore, daily corrections are estimated for neutral densities derived from NRLMSISE-00. Our results indicate that these corrections improve model-based density simulations in order to provide density estimates at locations outside the vicinity of the GRACE satellites, in particular during the period of high solar/magnetic activity, e.g., during the St. Patrick's Day storm on 17 March 2015.
机译:低地球轨道(LEO)卫星上的超灵敏星载加速度计用于测量作用在这些卫星表面的非重力。这些力包括地球辐射压力,太阳辐射压力和大气阻力,其中前两个分别是由地球和太阳发出的辐射引起的,而后者与热层密度有关。机载加速度计测量值包含系统误差,在将其用于重力恢复或热层中性密度估算之前,需要通过应用校准来缓解这些误差。因此,我们改进,应用和比较了三种校准程序:(1)一种多步数值估计方法,该方法基于LEO卫星运动轨道的数值微分; (2)在动态精确轨道确定程序内对加速度计观测值进行校准,以及(3)将观测到的与模拟的作用在LEO卫星表面上的力进行比较。在这里,使用了通过重力恢复和气候实验(GRACE)获得的加速度计测量值。发现从三种校准程序得出的偏差和比例因子的时间序列在几天到几个月的时间尺度上是不同的。当考虑较长的时间尺度时,结果更相似(具有统计意义),在中高太阳活动期间,方法(1)和(2)的结果与方法(3)的结果显示出更好的一致性。然后将校准的加速度计观测值用于估算热圈中性密度。在安静期间,基于加速度计的密度估计值与经验中性密度模型(例如NRLMSISE-00)的估计值之间的差异非常明显,平均密度为22%(在低太阳活动期间),最高可达28%在高太阳活动期间。因此,估计每天校正来自NRLMSISE-00的中性密度。我们的结果表明,这些修正可以改善基于模型的密度模拟,以便在GRACE卫星附近的位置提供密度估计,尤其是在太阳/磁活动较高的时期,例如在圣帕特里克节风暴期间。 2015年3月17日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号