首页> 外文期刊>Animal Production Science >Production and forage quality of prairie grass (Bromus willdenowii) in comparison to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) in subtropical dairy pastures
【24h】

Production and forage quality of prairie grass (Bromus willdenowii) in comparison to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) in subtropical dairy pastures

机译:与亚热带奶牛牧场的多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne)和高羊茅(Festuca arundinacea)相比,草原草(Bromus willdenowii)的产量和牧草品质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A grazing study was conducted, over a 3-year period (1997–99), on the subtropical north coast of New South Wales, Australia, to compare the yield of prairie grass (Bromus willdenowii cv. Matua), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea cv. Vulcan) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Yatsyn), on a well-drained red krasnozem soil at Wollongbar Agricultural Research Institute (WAI) and on a heavy clay soil at Casino. The effect of grazing interval (equivalent to the time taken to regrow 1.5, 2.5 or 4 leaves/tiller) in spring, and forage quality of prairie grass in winter and spring was also assessed. At both sites, the dry matter (DM) yields of prairie grass over the establishment year and in year 2 were significantly (P<0.001) higher than for the other 2 grass species (mean for 2 years over the 2 sites was 23.8, 8.9 and 7.7 t DM/ha for prairie grass, ryegrass and tall fescue, respectively). In year 3, there was no production of tall fescue or ryegrass at the WAI site while prairie grass produced 11.3 t DM/ha although this was obtained from natural seedling recruitment after the sward was sprayed with a herbicide in February of that year. At the Casino site, ryegrass and tall fescue still made substantial growth in year 3 (3.1 and 2.1 t DM/ha for ryegrass and tall fescue, respectively) but this was significantly below the yields of prairie grass (5.5 t DM/ha). More frequent grazing of prairie grass in spring (equivalent to 1.5 leaves/tiller of regrowth) led to significantly (P<0.05) less plants surviving summer and less seedling recruitment in the following autumn. The annual yield of the 1.5 leaf treatment was significantly (P<0.05) lower than the remaining treatments but only in the third year of the study. Analysis of prairie grass forage samples, taken in June (vegetative sward) and November (reproductive sward), gave magnesium values of less than 0.2% DM which is below the concentration found in ryegrass and that recommended for dairy cattle. The Ca : P and K : (Ca + Mg) ratios in prairie grass improved, as a forage for dairy cows, with regrowth time up to 5 leaves/tiller. Metabolisable energy remained constant with regrowth time in June at 10.8 MJ/kg DM but fell significantly in November from 10.7 MJ/kg DM, immediately post-grazing, to 9.2 MJ/kg DM at the 4.5 leaves/tiller stage of regrowth.
机译:在三年内(1997-99年),在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的亚热带北海岸进行了放牧研究,比较了草原草(Bromus willdenowii cv。Matua),高羊茅(Festuca arundinacea)的产量。沃尔坎巴尔农业研究所(WAI)排水良好的红色克拉斯诺泽姆土壤和赌场的厚黏土上)和多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne cv。Yatsyn)。还评估了春季放牧间隔(相当于重新种植1.5、2.5或4片叶子/分iller所花费的时间)以及冬季和春季草原草料质量的影响。在这两个地点,建立年份和第二年的草原草干物质(DM)产量均显着(P <0.001)高于其他两种草种(两个地点的2年平均值分别为23.8、8.9草原草,黑麦草和高羊茅草分别为7.7吨DM /公顷)。在第3年,WAI场址没有高脚羊茅或黑麦草的生产,而草原草的产量为11.3吨DM / ha,尽管这是在当年2月对该草皮喷洒除草剂后从自然苗招募中获得的。在赌场现场,黑麦草和高羊茅在第3年仍取得了实质性增长(黑麦草和高羊茅分别为3.1和2.1吨DM /公顷),但这大大低于草原草的产量(5.5吨DM /公顷)。春季更频繁地放牧草原草(相当于1.5叶片/再生长分iller),导致夏季幸存的植株显着减少(P <0.05),并于次年秋季减少了对幼苗的吸收。 1.5叶处理的年产量显着低于其他处理,但仅在研究的第三年(P <0.05)。对6月(植物草地)和11月(植物草地)采集的草原草料样品进行分析,得出镁含量低于0.2%DM,低于黑麦草中的浓度,建议用于奶牛。作为草牛的草料,草原草中的Ca:P和K:(Ca + Mg)比得到改善,再生时间最多为5片/分iller。代谢能在6月随再生时间保持恒定,为10.8 MJ / kg DM,但在11月从放牧后立即的10.7 MJ / kg DM显着下降,在4.5叶/分iller再生阶段降至9.2 MJ / kg DM。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Animal Production Science》 |2000年第8期|p.1059-1068|共10页
  • 作者单位

    ANSW Agriculture, Wollongbar Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, NSW 2477, Australia.BWrightson Seeds Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand.CAuthor for correspondence;

    e-mail: bill.fulkerson@agric.nsw.gov.a;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号