首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia >Epidural catheter connectors: a laboratory-based comparison of the Portex Tuohy-Borst and EpiFuse? designs?
【24h】

Epidural catheter connectors: a laboratory-based comparison of the Portex Tuohy-Borst and EpiFuse? designs?

机译:硬膜外导管连接器:Portex Tuohy-Borst和EpiFuse在实验室的比较? designs ?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Disconnection of an epidural catheter from its connector may result in patient harm and commonly requires resiting of the epidural. Clamp-connector designs such as the novel Portex EpiFuse? potentially offer an improved safety profile over screw-cap designs such as the Tuohy-Borst, but comparative studies are limited. We therefore compared the tensile strength of EpiFuse and Tuohy-Borst connectors in a laboratory setting. We further sought to establish whether operator modification of the EpiFuse increased its vulnerability to disconnection. The median (IQR [range]) force to induce disconnection was 8.0 (4.1–12.8 [0.0–22.6]) N for Tuohy-Borst connectors and 16.4 (15.2–17.7 [5.7–18.9]) and 15.9 (15.0–16.9 [5.8–18.1]) N for standard and modified EpiFuse connectors, respectively (p?
机译:硬膜外导管与其连接器断开连接可能会导致患者受伤,并且通常需要重新放置硬膜外导管。夹具连接器设计,例如新颖的Portex EpiFuse?与诸如Tuohy-Borst之类的螺帽设计相比,它有可能提供改进的安全性,但是比较研究有限。因此,我们在实验室环境中比较了EpiFuse和Tuohy-Borst连接器的拉伸强度。我们还试图确定操作员对EpiFuse的修改是否增加了其断开连接的脆弱性。 Tuohy-Borst连接器引起断开的中值(IQR [范围])力为8.0(4.1–12.8 [0.0–22.6])N,16.4(15.2–17.7 [5.7-18.9])和15.9(15.0-16.9 [5.8]) –18.1])N分别用于标准和改进的EpiFuse连接器(p?<?0.0001)。 Tuohy-Borst也不太可能达到英国标准的要求(13/20组vs 19/20和20/20,p?=?0.002)。 EpiFuse的修改不会影响管腔通畅性或连接强度。我们得出结论,在受控条件下,EpiFuse连接器优于Tuohy-Borst连接器。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Anaesthesia》 |2012年第10期|1119-1124|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Specialty Training Registrar in Anaesthesia;

    Consultant Anaesthetist Royal Gwent Hospital Newport UK;

    Senior Research Fellow Cardiff University Cardiff UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号